Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Events have moved swiftly and symptomatically lately in the Fifth Circuit. Long known as the circuit with the greatest skepticism of federal regulation of the economy, it turned its attention to the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA), 31 U.S.C. §5336, which requires non-exempt companies to report the identity of their beneficial owners. While many companies saw the CTA as burdensome and ill-advised, the statute had seemed constitutionally safe because it only regulated commercial activity and only required information. Yet, on Dec. 3, 2024, a district court in the Eastern District of Texas held that the CTA was unconstitutional and issued a nationwide injunction against the enforcement of the CTA and its implementing rule. See, Tex. Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218294 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2024).
This result may have seemed par for the course in terms of recent decisions in the Fifth Circuit, which decisions have also struck down the SEC’s Climate Change Disclosure Rules and the Federal Trade Commission’s attempts to prohibit covenants not to compete and, more ominously, resurrected the long dormant anti-delegation doctrine in a way that questions the constitutionality of many administrative agencies. See, Consumers’ Rsch. Cause Based Commerce, Inc. v. FCC, 109 F.4th 743 (5th Cir. 2024) (finding the combination of broad delegation and possible future delegation to a private entity to violate the separation of powers).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.