Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sports leagues and competitions' market clout and the increasing consolidation of sports content-streaming companies have recently spawned several civil antitrust actions aimed at reigning in these market powers.
In 2311 Racing LLC v. National Association of Stock Car Racing LLC (NASCAR), 3:24-CV-00886 (W.D.N.C.), racing teams 2311 and Front Row Motorsports Inc. have sued NASCAR over the latter’s inclusion of a waiver clause in agreements that permit teams to compete in NASCAR’s 2025 pinnacle Cup Series. The disputed clause states in part: “Team Owner … hereby releases and forever discharges [NASCAR Event Management] ... from all [claims] ... arising out of or relating to the criteria used by [NASCAR Event Management] to determine whether or not to enter into, or to offer to enter into, a Charter Member Agreement with the Team Owner or any other Person ....”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.