Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

BankruptcyThe Bankruptcy StrategistFeatures

Did 'FTX' Start Trend of Using the Threat of an Examiner Costs and Complications As a Source of Leverage?

By William E. Curtin and Chelsea McManus
March 01, 2025

In January 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit found in FTX Trading Ltd., 91 F.4th 148 (3d Cir. 2024) that, if certain statutory requirements are met, appointment of an examiner under section 1104(c) of the Bankruptcy Code is mandatory upon the motion of a party in interest.

This Circuit-level confirmation that the “shall” in the examiner statute does in fact actually mean shall led to concern among bankruptcy practitioners that the now-confirmed mandatory nature of this provision would lead to the weaponization of examiner motions as a tool for delaying cases or exacting unrelated concessions.
This was previously less of a concern as, notwithstanding the statutory language, bankruptcy courts — including those in Delaware and New York — considered examiner appointments discretionary based on the subsequent “as is appropriate” in the text of section 1104(c).

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing Image

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.