Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the United States, a debtor’s ability to seek a fresh financial start through bankruptcy is constitutionally protected. Therefore, courts routinely invalidate restrictions designed to limit a debtor’s ability to file a voluntary bankruptcy petition as void against public policy. Nevertheless, it is not uncommon for a business entity’s governing documents to contain limitations or restrictive requirements that must be satisfied before bankruptcy protection can be sought. Oftentimes, these provisions allow a single person (or entity) to block a bankruptcy filing, whether by holding a “golden share” or simply by withholding consent. How to harmonize a debtor’s right to file against a creditor’s desire to protect its financial interests in that debtor has sparked a number of different judicial opinions.
A recent decision from U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge David Cleary for the Northern District of Illinois addresses this issue head on and found that filing restrictions aren’t always per se violative. See, In re 301 W. North Avenue, Case No. 24 B 2741 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Jan. 6, 2025). Cleary’s decision suggests that when certain protections for the debtor are in place, limitations imposed by creditors on seeking bankruptcy relief are permissible.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.