Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

What the Future Holds for the False Claims Act

By Jonathan Feld and Monika Harris
March 01, 2025

The False Claims Act (FCA) is one of the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) most powerful civil and criminal enforcement statutes. Also one of the oldest, it originated more than 150 years ago, after the Civil War, to pursue claims of fraud and defective weapons that had been sold to Union troops. The present day FCA provides for treble damages, civil monetary penalties, and recovery of attorney fees. See generally, 31 USC §3730. One of the crucial provisions authorizes qui tam relators to bring an enforcement action on behalf of the United States and receive up to 30% of any recovery if the DOJ does not intervene. If the government does decide to intervene, relators can still receive up to 25% of any recovery. Payment of their attorney fees is available in either setting.

The FCA recoveries have been substantial. In January 2025, the DOJ announced, for the fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2024, recovery of $2.9 billion, which was the highest amount in the past three years. Importantly, the DOJ also reported that there were almost 1,000 private relators’ actions (979) — an increase of 37% from the preceding year. See, DOJ Jan. 15, 2025 Press Release. The importance of FCA cases, especially those brought by private relators, is underscored by the increasing number of large, private actions such as the January 2025 complaint against Walgreens for filling millions of unlawful opioid prescriptions. U.S. v. Walgreen Co., et al., No. 1:23cv1617 (N.D. Ill. 2023), which initially started as a qui tam action in the Northern District of Illinois. The government intervened in the Walgreens case in light of the allegations of extensive fraudulent conduct and potential recovery.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.