Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Shift In Foreign Corruption Policy Could Amplify Risk of Extortion for Global Businesses
The Trump administration’s shift in enforcement policy away from foreign corruption and towards the fight against Transnational Criminal Organizations (TCOs) such as drug cartels, a shift that adds a spate of new designations of cartels as terrorist groups, may reduce the immediate risk to global businesses of an FCPA prosecution based on alleged extortion payments.
However, the same shift raises new threats to those businesses under statutes, including the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), that prohibit engagement of any kind with terrorist organizations, do not recognize an extortion defense, and may give rise to civil as well as criminal liability.
Businesses operating in environments where they are subject to demands for “protection” payments or other extortionate threats must investigate carefully and maintain strong compliance programs to minimize prosecution and litigation risks.
Trump’s Enforcement Priorities
President Donald Trump has indicated his intent to use the ATA and related statutes in addition to existing tools to combat cartels and other TCOs, even while he has deprioritized FCPA enforcement. In one of his first actions after inauguration, President Trump signed an executive order directing the State Department to designate cartels and other TCOs as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) and Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs). See, EO 14157 (Jan. 20, 2025).
On Feb. 20, 2025, the State Department designated eight TCOs, including organizations with significant operations in Mexico, Central America, and Venezuela, as FTOs and SDGTs pursuant to the Executive Order. 90 Fed. Reg. 10030 (Feb. 20, 2025).
On Feb. 5, Attorney General Pam Bondi issued a memorandum, “Total Elimination of Cartels and Transnational Criminal Organizations,” that directed the Department of Justice’s FCPA enforcement efforts to “prioritize investigations related to foreign bribery that facilitates the criminal operations of Cartels and TCOs, and shift focus away from investigations and cases that do not involve such a connection.”
Five days later, Trump issued an executive order directing that the Department of Justice (DOJ) “cease initiation of any new FCPA investigations or enforcement actions, unless the attorney general determines that an individual exception should be made.” EO 14207 (Feb. 10, 2025). It appears likely that any exceptions granted by the attorney general will relate to cases with a connection to cartels or TCOs, particularly those that are subject to FTO/SDGT designation.
This premium content is locked for Business Crimes Bulletin subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.