Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As legal and compliance teams adopt cloud-based collaboration tools like Microsoft 365, Google Workspace and Slack, they are unlocking unprecedented efficiency and flexibility in managing information. However, this evolution has also introduced a significant new layer of complexity, particularly concerning e-discovery. Hyperlinked files, unlike traditional email attachments, are dynamic versions of themselves, so it is as if they evolve in motion. Often stored externally from the collaboration platform, they represent a fundamental shift in how organizations manage and secure evidence for legal cases.
Failure to address these challenges could lead to severe consequences, including regulatory violations, spoliation claims and incomplete productions. For example, regulations such as the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and SEC Rule 17a-4 set high standards for defensible data management. Unfortunately, hyperlinked files often lack the visibility and control those traditional attachments offer legal teams.
Proactively securing critical hyperlinked data is no longer optional. It is a necessity for avoiding compliance pitfalls and maintaining defensible workflows in an era of cloud-based document collaboration.
Hyperlinked files fundamentally differ from attachments because they are not bound to a specific version of a document. Instead, they often point to cloud-hosted files with unrestricted updates. For instance, an executive may hyperlink a PowerPoint presentation stored in Google Drive within an email. Between the hyperlink’s creation and collection during discovery, the file could have changed multiple times, making it exceedingly difficult to pinpoint the exact version shared.
This becomes particularly challenging when hyperlinked files pertain to crucial evidence in a legal dispute. Without proactive tracking systems in place, it is easy to lose the original time-stamped version of a document. As a result, evidence becomes unreliable or even legally inadmissible.
Compliance Risks with Incomplete Preservation
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Social media is going through its teenage years. Moody, unpredictable, deeply self-aware — yet brimming with potential. For businesses and law firms, this moment is an invitation — not an identity crisis. It’s a chance to reassess how we show up.
The question this year: How should (or could) law firms be using AI as the technology stands today?
The legal industry is having a moment in the media spotlight. For lawyers and firms, and their marketing professionals, now is the time to up their go-to-market efforts.
Many law firms, especially small and midsize practices, struggle with their marketing and business development efforts. Often, they turn to traditional solutions, such as hiring a marketing coordinator, hoping this role can create meaningful impact. However, without a robust game plan, the outcome often becomes reactive, administrative marketing work, sidelining efforts to establish the firm’s unique positioning and visibility. A fractional CMO offers an alternative.