Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As longtime subscribers to Cybersecurity Law & Strategy may recall, I go into the conference each year with a question for all of those with whom I have meetings, whether scheduled and formal or not so much. Sometimes the question and answers don’t amount to much and sometimes they are worth noting. The last time that happened was in 2023 when I asked about AI and legal in general (see, “To AI or Not to AI” in the April 2023 issue of Cybersecurity Law & Strategy).
The question this year was how law firms should (or could) be using AI as the technology stands today — adding that last qualifier to try and reduce the amount of projected future AI capabilities and to make it more useful to pardon the pun.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.