Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Buying distressed real estate from a receiver presents unique opportunities and challenges. A court-appointed receiver manages and preserves assets for creditors, investors, or other stakeholders, typically in cases involving financial distress or mismanagement. Because of these circumstances, purchasing real estate from a receiver requires a strategic approach. Below are key considerations for successfully acquiring real estate in a receivership sale.
One of the first steps in purchasing a property from a receiver is to establish communication. Understanding the best way to present your offer can give you an advantage. The receiver may be working with an auction company, a real estate broker or managing the sale directly. If no intermediary has been retained, a direct offer could be more attractive, as it allows the receiver to maximize recovery without additional costs. Since the receiver's duty is to maximize asset value, they will likely be open to discussing the most effective way to structure your offer. Whether the sale is through auction, listing, or negotiation, knowing the process in advance will allow you to tailor your proposal accordingly.
A receivership sale often involves distressed assets, making due diligence even more critical than in a traditional transaction. Buyers should investigate the following areas:
The receiver may already have some of these documents and could share them, often subject to confidentiality requirements. Engaging early can help you obtain relevant information before making an offer.
Receivership sales require court approval, which can affect the transaction timeline and process. Buyers should determine whether the property has enough equity to clear title issues or whether a court order will be needed to convey a clean title. There are two main scenarios:
Understanding the required court approval helps avoid potential delays. Buyers should also be prepared for possible objections from creditors or other stakeholders, which could impact the sale timeline.
Financing a receivership purchase can be challenging due to the distressed nature of the asset. Traditional mortgage lenders may be hesitant to fund such purchases due to concerns over title issues, property conditions or court approval delays. Buyers should consider alternative financing options, such as:
Having financing options in place strengthens your offer and ensures a smoother transaction process.
Due to the distressed nature of receivership properties, buyers must find innovative solutions to close the deal. Consider:
Receivership sales involve legal complexities and court oversight. Hiring an experienced real estate attorney and a broker familiar with distressed sales can help navigate approvals, negotiate terms and identify potential red flags.
Acquiring real estate from a receiver requires careful planning, due diligence and strategic structuring. Engaging early, understanding legal hurdles, securing financing, and working with skilled professionals can turn distressed properties into valuable investments while aiding in financial recoveries.
*****
Sandra M. Ferrera, a partner at Day Pitney, focuses on real estate transactions, financing and development. She serves as special real estate counsel in federal and state receiverships, including SEC enforcement actions. Ferrera has also held leadership roles in professional organizations. Her experience in distressed assets and complex real estate transactions makes her a key resource in the field.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.