Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Intellectual PropertyPatent Licensing and TransactionsThe Intellectual Property StrategistFeatures

Swearing Behind: Overcoming Asserted Prior Art in PTAB Proceedings

By Emily J. Roberts, Ph.D. and Adam R. Brausa
April 30, 2025

Introduction
With the adoption of the America Invents Act (AIA) in 2011 and the accompanying change from a first-to-invent system to a first-to-file system, one might be tempted to conclude that first-to-invent concepts like prior conception and reasonable diligence are no longer relevant. But despite the passage of more than a decade since the enactment of the AIA, a significant number of patents with an effective filing date before March 16, 2013 remain in existence and will continue to be litigated under pre-AIA rules. (See, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (9th ed., rev. January 2024) (MPEP) §2159.) See also, Colleen V. Chien et al., “The AIA at Ten-How Much Do the Pre-AIA Prior Art Rules Still Matter?,” 35 Patently-O Patent Law Journal 1, 1 (2021) (reporting that approximately 90% of litigated patents fell under the pre-AIA system in 2020 versus 100% in 2013).

For such patents, patent owners may still be able to antedate or remove an asserted reference as prior art in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB or Board) proceeding by demonstrating an invention date prior to the effective date of the prior art or removing the prior art by demonstrating that the prior art described the inventor’s own work. See, MPEP §§715, 2132.01(I). Consequently, the legal standards and factual requirements for antedating and removing prior art will remain important for patent owners and petitioners alike to understand and consider, at least until the 20-year anniversary of the AIA’s enactment in 2033.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.