Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As a former Chief Marketing Officer and now an advisor to law firms at 742 Advisors, I’ve witnessed firsthand the challenges of implementing meaningful change in legal organizations. Even the most innovative ideas can fall flat if attorneys aren't on board. Without champions driving initiatives forward, progress stalls, other fires burn brighter, and opportunities are lost.
Law firms, based on precedent, steeped in tradition, and historically resistant to disruption, often struggle with change management. Yet, in today’s rapidly evolving legal landscape, adapting to new technologies, processes and client expectations is no longer optional — it’s essential for survival. But change management is critical to stay competitive and thrive in an increasingly shifting marketplace.
Whether it’s adopting new technologies or rethinking workflows, successful change management requires a structured approach that aligns strategy with execution while addressing attorneys' concerns.
Lawyers are trained to rely on evidence and logic. Use data-driven insights to demonstrate the necessity and potential benefits of change. For example, BigHand research notes that:
Presenting concrete data helps firms build a compelling case for change that resonates with attorneys.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?