Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In an action to establish title by adverse possession, out-of-possession cotenant appealed from the Appellate Division’s affirmance of Supreme Court’s grant of summary judgment to the possessing cotenant. The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that mutual mistake about the property’s ownership did not defeat the adverse possessor’s claim.
When the former owner of the property died intestate in 1992 she was survived by two brothers, Yale and Zangwill. Zangwill’s son, who believed Yale had predeceased the former owner, so advised Surrogate’s Court, and the court then determined that Zangwill was the former owner’s sole distribute. Zangwill then renounced his interest in favor of his son, who has maintained possession since that time, negotiating leases, collecting rent, paying taxes, and making substantial renovations. When he tried to sell the premises in 2018, a title search revealed that Yale had died in 1993, one year after the former owner, and therefore inherited half of the estate. Zangwill’s son then brought this action for a declaration that he had acquired title by adverse possession. Meanwhile, Yale’s estate had passed to his wife, then to his wife’s sister, then to the sister’s husband, and finally to a trust. The trustee of the trust counterclaimed for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty by Zangwill’s son. Supreme Court granted summary judgment to Zangwill’s son, and the trust appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?