Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Five new state privacy laws took effect in January 2025 — Delaware (DPDPA), Iowa (ICDPA), Nebraska (NDPA), New Hampshire (NHPA), and New Jersey (NJDPA) — adding to the compliance maze for businesses operating across state lines. This latest wave of legislation creates a patchwork of requirements that include critical variations in three key areas: applicability thresholds, covered data categories and enforcement protocols.
Threshold variations alone present immediate compliance hurdles. Delaware casts the widest net, regulating businesses handling data of just 35,000 consumers (excluding payment data) — a standard that could ensnare regional retailers and mid-market SaaS providers. Iowa adopts a more conventional 100,000-consumer threshold, while New Jersey breaks from peer states by not providing a blanket exemption for employee or Business-to-Business (B2B) data. In contrast, Nebraska and New Hampshire exclude employee and B2B data, focusing instead on consumer data used in individual or household contexts. This lack of uniformity forces multistate operators to implement nuanced compliance matrices, as a business might be regulated in Delaware but exempt in Iowa despite identical operations. The operational implications are significant. Employers with multistate workforces must now reconcile New Jersey's inclusive approach with Nebraska and New Hampshire's B2B exemptions. Service providers face similar challenges when determining whether client engagements trigger compliance obligations. Comprehensive data mapping and tracking are legal necessities, as organizations must now track not just data categories but the precise residential jurisdictions of each data subject to properly assess their obligations.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.