Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

IP News

By Sarah Brand and Jeff Ginsberg
June 30, 2025

Federal Circuit: District Court Did Not Err In Declining to Find Infringement By Moderna’s Activities Involving COVID-19 Vaccine


On June 4, 2025, a Federal Circuit panel consisting of Judges Taranto, Chen, and Hughes issued a unanimous opinion, authored by Judge Taranto, in Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Moderna, Inc., Case No. 2023-2357. The panel affirmed the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware’s decision that appellee’s activities involving its mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine SPIKEVAX® did not infringe appellant’s U.S. Patent Nos. 11,246,933 (’933 patent) or 11,382,979 (’979 patent). Slip Op. at 2–3.

Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (Alnylam) owns the ’933 and ’979 patents. Id. at 2. The ’979 patent is the child of the ’933 patent. Id. Both patents are directed to biodegradable lipids and their use for the delivery of active agents, such as nucleic acids. Id. at 3. Specifically, the ’933 and ’979 patents disclosed a cationic lipid with at least a branched alkyl terminal hydrophobic chain in at least one biodegradable hydrophobic tail. Id. at 5. In March 2022, Alnylam sued Defendants Moderna, Inc., ModernaTX, Inc., and Moderna US, Inc. (collectively Moderna) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging that Moderna infringed the ’933 patent through activities involving the SM-102 lipid in SPIKEVAX®. Id. at 6. In July 2022, after the ’979 patent issued, Alnylam sued Moderna in the same forum for alleged infringement of the ’979 patent through activities involving SPIKEVAX®. Id. The two pending actions were consolidated. Id.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.