Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Real Property Law

Retroactive Application of FAPA Does Not Violate State Constitution; Retroactive Application of FAPA Does Not Violation Contracts Clause; No Questions of Fact Preclude Summary Judgment on Claim for Partition and Sale; Interest of Heirs Extinguished By Adverse Possession; Sister’s Adverse Possession Claim Against Brother Dismissed

12 minute read December 23, 2025 at 04:42 PM
By
New York Real Estate Law Reporter Staff
Real Property Law

Retroactive Application of FAPA Does Not Violate State Constitution



Article 13 LLC v. Ponce De Leon Federal Bank

2025 WL 3272351

Court of Appeals

(Opinion by Chief Judge Wilson)

This premium content is locked for New York Real Estate Law Reporter subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN New York Real Estate Law Reporter

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), which works under the umbrella of the Librarian of Congress, sets statutory-license royalty terms and rates. The U.S. Courts of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently issued two notable decisions about the CRB.

October 01, 2026