Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

The Shifting Landscape of Antitrust Law Around Algorithmic Pricing Software

While antitrust law around algorithmic pricing is still developing, these decisions and settlements offer some key lessons and suggested guideposts for assessing the risks associated with the sale or use of algorithmic pricing software. Key takeaways follow.

8 minute read March 01, 2026 at 12:09 AM
By
Parker Miller and Alexis Gilman
The Shifting Landscape of Antitrust Law Around Algorithmic Pricing Software

Across a range of industries, federal, state and private class-action plaintiffs have challenged software vendors’ sale and their customers’ use of algorithmic pricing (or “revenue management”) as antitrust law violations.

This premium content is locked for Business Crimes Bulletin subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN Business Crimes Bulletin

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

The Copyright Royalty Board (CRB), which works under the umbrella of the Librarian of Congress, sets statutory-license royalty terms and rates. The U.S. Courts of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently issued two notable decisions about the CRB.

October 01, 2026