The U.S. Supreme Court recently held in that the First Amendment's religion clauses provide for a "ministerial exception." In doing so, the Court promoted religious autonomy at the expense of ministers' rights and society's interest in eradicating discrimination.
- February 28, 2012R. Scott Oswald
A recent decision discussed herein is significant because it means that employers who have been admonished by the DOL for alleged violations of the FLSA need not sit and wait for the DOL to file a lawsuit against them.
January 30, 2012Annette A. Idalski, Daniel D. Pipitone and Kelly E. CampanellaEnglish-only policies have long been criticized and targeted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Here's a look at some recent litigation.
January 30, 2012Delyanne BarrosThe use of volunteers and interns by nonprofits comes with legal risks, which may be reduced by following four basic rules. This article discusses both federal and California state law.
January 30, 2012Ofer LionThe National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) announced in a press release on Dec. 23, 2011, that it has postponed the original Jan. 31, 2012, deadline requiring employers to post the NLRB Notice informing employees of certain rights to April 30, 2012.
December 29, 2011ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Illinois is now one of 22 jurisdictions in the United States that extend some form of state-level spousal rights to same-gender couples.
December 14, 2011Belinda S. MorganThis article provides an overview of the Dodd-Frank Act's whistleblower and anti-retaliation provisions, as well as practical steps to help employers avoid retaliation claims.
December 14, 2011Russell E. AdlerAn open discussion about unions with your employees is legal and a good idea, whether you want a union-free environment or not, according to the author. Here's why.
December 14, 2011Robert G. BrodyThe fluctuating workweek and employer options.
December 14, 2011Karla GrossenbacherIn a recent, unpublished decision, the Fourth U.S. Court of Appeals held that an employer may be responsible for the sexual harassment of one of its employees by the employer's client. This is an interesting issue that the Fourth Circuit had failed to address ' until this decision.
November 15, 2011Kevin C. McCormick

