Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Register

Litigation

  • In-depth analysis of a case involving potential criminal liability under the AKS.

    May 02, 2015ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Discussion of two recent important rulings.

    May 02, 2015ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • It is pivotal that a practitioner who wants to conduct formal discovery of social media user content understand how each site stores and communicates its data. Armed with information, the informed attorney may well reap huge rewards when engaging in digital discovery.

    May 02, 2015Emily T. Acosta and Eric P. Conn
  • An Atlanta R&B singer who said on a reality TV show that the CEO of her former record label mismanaged her career and beat her years ago in a hotel room has prevailed in a defamation lawsuit the CEO brought in Fulton County Superior Court.

    May 02, 2015Kathleen Baydala Joyner
  • Customers in the United States often pay more for valued branded goods than buyers of the same goods in less well-developed economies. Higher prices here in the U.S. in turn support profits and shareholder value for manufacturers of branded goods, and strengthen domestic industry.Yet this pricing disparity for the same products in different markets creates an incentive for the so-called grey market.

    May 02, 2015Lyle Vander Schaaf
  • Circuit Court Reinstates Dealer's Defamation Claims Against Manufacturer
    Court Denies Franchisee's Motion to Vacate Attorneys' Fees Award

    May 02, 2015Cynthia M. Klaus and Bryan Huntington
  • This edition of the Quarterly State Compliance Review looks at some legislation of interest to corporate lawyers that went into effect between Jan. 1, 2015 and April 1, 2015. It also looks at some recent decisions of interest from the courts of Delaware, Georgia and Maryland.

    April 02, 2015Sandra Feldman
  • In its first-ever ruling in an appeal from a final decision in an inter partes review (IPR) under the America Invents Act, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's rulemaking for conducting IPR proceedings. The Federal Circuit's decision leaves in place IPR rules that increase the likelihood of invalidating patents and solidifies IPR as an attractive alternative to district court litigation.

    April 02, 2015Daniel Melman
  • In Part One, last month, the authors examined the Federal Circuit's VirnetX decision affirming lower courts' role as gatekeepers for expert testimony. The discussion continues herein.

    April 02, 2015Rudy Kim and Michelle Yang