When someone buys 25% of a four-unit co-op, does the shareholder expect the co-op to be ruled by only one other shareholder, which could be the case if one of those four shareholders owns more than 50% of the co-op's shares? The issue arose in a recent case ...
- June 24, 2013Darryl M. Vernon
An in-depth look at recent important rulings.
June 21, 2013ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |A look at a key case in New York.
June 21, 2013ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Winning Strategies for Plaintiff's Direct and Cross-Examination
June 06, 2013ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Whatever one thinks of the ruling in Fleischer I, the decision serves as an important reminder of something for which it has received little attention: its careful consideration of the distinctions between copyright and trademark protection.
May 31, 2013Colleen Bal and Evan M. W. SternOn April 25, 2013, Judge James L. Robart of the Western District of Washington publicly issued his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law from the November 2012 bench trial in Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., et al.
May 31, 2013Mark A. Chapman and Rose Cordero PreyHighlights of the latest franchising cases from around the country.
May 31, 2013Cynthia M. Klaus and Susan E. TegtOnline Infringement/Class Action Issues
Trademark Infringement/Fictional Products
True-Life Depictions/In TV ProgramsMay 31, 2013Stan SoocherWhile Internet applications of ADR are neither technologically nor legally restricted to disputes arising out of Internet transactions, it seems to be particularly suitable for the resolution of e-commerce disputes when parties are frequently located far from one another.
May 31, 2013Jonathan Bick

