An Internet Service Provider (ISP) can legally search the e-mail that it processes. ISPs may lawfully search the content of users' e-mails for many purposes, including assisting law enforcement, ensuring compliance with the ISP's terms-of-use agreement and protecting the ISP from legal difficulties, to name a few. Such activities do not currently constitute an invasion of the e-mail user's privacy.
- November 28, 2011Jonathan Bick
Given the possibility of impersonation and digital fabrication in the online world, the information displayed on social media profiles is not immediately verifiable and presents issues of authentication and admissibility under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
November 28, 2011Richard Raysman And Peter BrownInsurance Policy Doesn't Cover Artists Suit Against Record Company
No Oral Agreement for TV Producer and Distributor to Share Revenue
Non-Payment of Foreign Record Royalties Not Enough for Rescission of Entire ContractNovember 28, 2011Stan SoocherARTIST ROYALTIES/DIGITAL DOWNLOADS
TAXPAYER LIABILITY/CONTENT PURCHASESNovember 28, 2011Stan SoocherThe U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit again threw out a $550,000 fine against CBS Corp. for televising Janet Jackson's "wardrobe malfunction" during the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show.
November 28, 2011Gina PassarellaMany writers, observers and enthusiasts following this year's professional sports labor disputes in both the NFL and the NBA focused solely on the players, the owners and the fans. But there is another group of stakeholders that is inevitably affected by a lack of labor peace: sponsorship partners.
November 28, 2011Benjamin R. MulcahyA new system for calculating interim maintenance awards in matrimonial actions, adopted last year to make no-fault divorce more palatable, is under fire from many attorneys who say it is confusing, and potentially inequitable.
November 28, 2011Joel StashenkoA recent decision handed down by the Manhattan Supreme Court is highlighting the fact that although the SUNY cap has its place, it is not the last word. That case, Pamela T. v Marc B., deserves a serious look.
November 28, 2011Janice G. Inman
