If you are the owner of a property that is being licensed into a potential motion picture franchise, how do you contractually protect the rights to your existing character or property so that the movies and related items being created do not damage your preexisting property? This article examines the approaches customarily utilized.
- September 28, 2011Mark Stankevich
Highlights of the latest intellectual property news from around the country.
September 28, 2011Jeffrey S. Ginsberg And Joseph MercadanteThe U.S. District Court for the Central District of California recently entered a preliminary injunction against a former franchisee, where the franchisor had repeatedly notified the franchisee of various deficiencies, and the franchisor ultimately terminated the franchise agreement.
September 28, 2011Douglas M. Mansfield And J. Todd KennardA spate of recent case law raises the question of which circumstances will enable advice rendered in benefits matters to be protected by the attorney-client privilege and the related work product doctrine.
September 28, 2011Marcia S. WagnerHighlights of the latest franchising cases from around the country.
September 28, 2011Charles G. Miller And Darryl A. HartIn some cases, landlords have persuaded courts to "pierce the corporate veil," so as to recover sums from a corporate tenant's creditworthy parent entity and/or principal(s). In other cases, courts have refused to pierce the corporate veil.This article discusses when a court will, or will not, pierce the corporate veil.
September 26, 2011Alexander Lycoyannis
