The in-depth story of a successful reorganization endeavor.
- June 27, 2011Joel H. Levitin, Maya Peleg, Mitchell B. Arden and Michael P. Gaul
In a rare and sweeping bankruptcy ruling, a federal bankruptcy judge backed by most of his colleagues in the Central District of California has held that the federal Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional.
June 15, 2011Kate MoserNot all file-sharing websites are created equal, according to U.S. District Court Judge Beryl A. Howell of the U.S District Court for the District of Washington.
May 27, 2011Zoe TillmanWhat's at issue is control, obviously, and the great lengths to which some will go to maintain it, even as they benefit from the wide-open, free-flowing viral information torrent of the Internet.
May 27, 2011Robert W. Clarida and Robert J. BernsteinOne thing to do when hiring a celebrity endorser is to be certain the contract includes a "morals clause" that permits termination of a contract if the endorser decides to use Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, etc., to tweet, post or upload offensive comments and materials. Know, however, that celebrity agents are very careful not to let contracts be terminated for bad behavior.
May 27, 2011Doug WoodA Massachusetts state court judge has ruled that a Boston software developer's case against defunct social media site ConnectU Inc. and its founders and key shareholders, including the Winklevoss twins, can move forward. Also, the Winklevosses' have taken their bid to undo their Facebook settlement to the Supreme Court.
May 27, 2011Sheri QualtersDespite recent protestations to the contrary, New Jersey duty-to-defend law retains the same unique position that it has for more than four decades.
May 26, 2011Daren S. McNally and and Matthew I. GennaroHow do U.S. courts resolve the conflicts between U.S. discovery and overseas laws, and in particular the application of the privilege?
May 26, 2011Philip M. BerkowitzIn-depth commentary on recent high-profile rulings.
May 25, 2011ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |There has been much confusion as to the jurisdiction of the City and State to regulate rents. At least some of this confusion has been dispelled by the Court of Appeals' recent decision in Casado v. Markus, 16 N.Y.3d 329 (2011).
May 25, 2011Jeffrey Turkel

