Who's doing what; who's going where.
- November 16, 2012ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
Highlights of the latest insurance cases from around the country.
November 16, 2012ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Several courts have recently held that an insured bears the burden of demonstrating proper exhaustion of underlying policies, including where multiple policies are involved in a settlement. These decisions have prevented insureds from accessing millions of dollars in excess coverage based on the unambiguous exhaustion language included in the operative excess policies.
November 16, 2012William P. Shelley and Samantha EvansThe meaning of "anti-assignment" clauses has been hotly disputed since 2003, when the California Supreme Court interpreted the clause in a manner that restricted the transfer of coverage rights in certain corporate transactions. This article examines how other courts have resolved the anti-assignment issue in the last decade.
November 16, 2012Seth A. Tucker and Charles FischetteWho's doing what; who's going where.
November 14, 2012ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Recently, two New York federal district courts reached conflicting decisions in the Coudert Brothers LLP and Thelen LLP bankruptcy cases with respect to a law firm's purported ownership interest in future profits from its former clients' matters pending on the date of the law firm's dissolution, or "unfinished business.
November 14, 2012Robert W. Dremluk and Ryan PinkstonThe firestorm of publicity regarding clients pushing back and refusing to pay for certain fees, and especially soft costs, begs the question: Is the traditional cost recovery model dying or perhaps already dead? The answer is no.
November 14, 2012Robert MatternThis article describes 14 approaches to enhancing profitability other than working more hours and charging higher hourly rates.
November 14, 2012Joel A. RoseHighlights of the latest intellectual property news from around the country.
November 02, 2012Jeffrey S. Ginsberg and Joseph MercadanteOverly aggressive enforcement of trademark rights by high-profile brand owners can lead to consumer backlash when such enforcement is perceived as "trademark bullying" of the "little guy." Such enforcement efforts have grown increasingly hazardous during the era of Internet blogging and social networking.
November 02, 2012Carl A. Schaffer

