Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

LJN Newsletters

  • Who's doing what; who's going where.

    November 14, 2012ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Recently, two New York federal district courts reached conflicting decisions in the Coudert Brothers LLP and Thelen LLP bankruptcy cases with respect to a law firm's purported ownership interest in future profits from its former clients' matters pending on the date of the law firm's dissolution, or "unfinished business.

    November 14, 2012Robert W. Dremluk and Ryan Pinkston
  • The firestorm of publicity regarding clients pushing back and refusing to pay for certain fees, and especially soft costs, begs the question: Is the traditional cost recovery model dying or perhaps already dead? The answer is no.

    November 14, 2012Robert Mattern
  • Highlights of the latest intellectual property news from around the country.

    November 02, 2012Jeffrey S. Ginsberg and Joseph Mercadante
  • Overly aggressive enforcement of trademark rights by high-profile brand owners can lead to consumer backlash when such enforcement is perceived as "trademark bullying" of the "little guy." Such enforcement efforts have grown increasingly hazardous during the era of Internet blogging and social networking.

    November 02, 2012Carl A. Schaffer
  • The Seventh Circuit has now adopted the conflicting view that ' 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code does not affect trademark licenses in one way or another and that Lubrizol Enterprises, Inc. v. Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc. was incorrectly decided.

    November 02, 2012Judith L. Grubner
  • In a closely followed case involving the patentability of DNA sequences of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which account for most forms of inherited breast and ovarian cancer, the Federal Circuit largely followed its prior 2011 ruling and again held that isolated DNA sequences are patent-eligible subject matter.

    November 02, 2012Veronica Mu'oz
  • Dear Readers:

    Due to the power outage caused by Hurricane Sandy, publication of The Intellectual Property Strategist was delayed. LJN regrets any inconvenience this may have caused.

    October 31, 2012ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |