Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

Real Property Law Image

Real Property Law

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

An in-depth look at several major rulings.

Features

Landlord & Tenant Image

Landlord & Tenant

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

A look at a recent ruling.

Development Image

Development

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Two key rulings are discussed.

Features

Cooperatives & Condominiums Image

Cooperatives & Condominiums

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings of importance.

MERS Standing: Its Impact on Title Insurance Image

MERS Standing: Its Impact on Title Insurance

Marvin N. Bagwell

Two recent decisions that greatly affected title insurers on the issue of standing for all foreclosing lenders and of MERS in particular.

Features

Myriad Genetics Image

Myriad Genetics

Darren Donnelly

On July 29, 2011, the Federal Circuit handed down its decision in <i>Ass'n for Molecular Pathology et al. v. U.S.P.T.O.</i>, (often referred to as the "<i>Myriad Genetics</i> gene patent" case). The divided panel's three opinions reveal areas of broad agreement and notable disagreement about patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. ' 101 of several categories of patent claims of interest to life sciences industries.

Features

Decisions of Interest Image

Decisions of Interest

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Key rulings of importance are analyzed.

John Wiley & Sons v. Kirtsaeng Image

John Wiley & Sons v. Kirtsaeng

Matthew Siegal & Binni Shah

In <i>John Wiley &amp; Sons Inc., v. Kirtsaeng</i>,the Second Circuit took a stand against parallel importation of copyrighted works made under the authority of the U.S. copyright owner in a foreign country.

Features

NJ & CT News Image

NJ & CT News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The latest rulings from neighboring states.

Features

Supreme Court: 'Willful Blindness' Supports a Judgment of Induced Infringement Image

Supreme Court: 'Willful Blindness' Supports a Judgment of Induced Infringement

John M. Cone

In <i>Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S.A.</i>, the Supreme Court held that "willful blindness" may satisfy the knowledge element required for a finding of induced infringement. In so doing, the Court rejected the prior "deliberate indifference" standard articulated by the Federal Circuit.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel
    'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
    Read More ›
  • Divorce Lawyers' Obligation to Children
    Do divorce lawyers have an obligation to disclose client confidences when it is in the best interests of the client's child to do so? The short answer of the rules of professional responsibility is 'no' because a 'yes' answer is deemed to be fundamentally inconsistent with the premises of the adversary system in which the divorce lawyer functions. The longer answer is that the rules encourage ' but do not require ' a divorce lawyer to counsel the client to authorize the disclosure because it is in the best interests of both parent and child.
    Read More ›
  • Upping the Legal Training Ante
    Womble Carlyle's technology training and online learning programs were in need of an upgrade. Unprecedented firm growth, heightened emphasis on developing lawyers' core technology competencies, and a need to streamline and automate existing e-learning processes led the firm to initiate a fundamental shift.
    Read More ›