The use of P.A.s presents a number of medico-legal issues for a practice that must be considered, both by medical practitioners and their legal counsel. Failure to do so could result in increased liability exposure for the physician and the practice.
- October 24, 2011Barry B. Cepelewicz and Richard J. Nealon
Last month, we discussed the rising incidence of deaths related to hospital-acquired infections. With the accompanying publicity of the dangers MRSA infection poses, it is not surprising that litigation in this area is also on the rise.
October 24, 2011Brandon SwartzThe pros and cons of "telemedicine," and what it means to the med mal practitioner.
October 24, 2011Elizabeth A. SyerWho's doing what; who's going where.
October 24, 2011ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Recently, in Smith v. Bayer Corp., the Supreme Court addressed whether a federal court decision denying class certification had any preclusive effect on efforts by other plaintiffs to seek certification in state court under nearly identically worded state procedural rules.
October 24, 2011Jeffrey A. HolmstrandLost profits calculations can be a very tricky proposition and are not to be entered into lightly. In the context of product liability, as in any other context, the party alleging the loss has to prove certain elements.
October 24, 2011Jeff Willoughby and Jim StavrosIn FCC v. AT&T, the Supreme Court made clear that businesses that wish to protect information submitted to the government had better be ready to demonstrate that the information falls under FOIA Exemption 4. Therefore, businesses should take proactive steps to ensure that they are prepared to make such demonstration when the need arises.
October 24, 2011Kurt HamrockAn interesting look at ongoing litigation.
October 24, 2011Nate RaymondAccording to a 2009 survey conducted by the Profit Sharing/401k Council of America, over 90% of all plans surveyed offered balance inquiries and investment changes online. So what's the problem?
October 24, 2011Neal S. Schelberg and Ted TywangIn MasTec Advanced Technologies, the NLRB found that the criticism expressed by employees was concerted activity and thus protected activity under the National Labor Relations Act. Consequently, the employer's termination of the employees was deemed unlawful.
October 24, 2011Mark N. Reinharz

