Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Register

LJN Newsletters

  • If you are the owner of a property that is being licensed into a potential motion picture franchise, how do you contractually protect the rights to your existing character or property so that the movies and related items being created do not damage your preexisting property? This article examines the approaches customarily utilized.

    September 28, 2011Mark Stankevich
  • Who's doing what; who's going where.

    September 28, 2011ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Pay Proportional to Performance is an important guiding principle underlying good compensation decisions. Individual firms will select different compensable criteria and weigh them according to their specific views. Good judgment will bring the principle alive.

    September 28, 2011James D. Cotterman
  • Highlights of the latest intellectual property news from around the country.

    September 28, 2011Jeffrey S. Ginsberg and Joseph Mercadante
  • The domestic industry requirement at the International Trade Commission has two prongs, one economic and the other technical. Two recent decisions of the ITC examine the economic prong in different factual contexts.

    September 28, 2011Dervis Magistre
  • The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California recently entered a preliminary injunction against a former franchisee, where the franchisor had repeatedly notified the franchisee of various deficiencies, and the franchisor ultimately terminated the franchise agreement.

    September 28, 2011Douglas M. Mansfield and J. Todd Kennard
  • Canada will soon have the dubious distinction of having what many believe is the most onerous and comprehensive anti-spam legislation in the world. Franchisors' relationships with customers and with their franchisees will be affected.

    September 28, 2011Dominic Mochrie and Andraya Frith
  • Judge Nancy Gertner of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts recently entered a judgment against a reinsurer, its controlling officer and the reinsurer's intermediary in the amount of $4.1 million for breach of contract, $4.1 million for double damages, $2.6 million for attorneys' fees and $1.6 million for prejudgment interest.

    September 28, 2011Nicholas C. Cramb and Alec J. Zadek