Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

NJ & & CT News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings in neighboring states.

Unjustifiable Conduct and Home State Jurisdiction Under the UCCJEA

Jeremy D. Morley

Interesting and difficult jurisdictional questions frequently arise when a parent unilaterally removes a child to an international jurisdiction.

Features

Movers & Shakers

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Who's doing what; who's going where.

Features

News Briefs

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Highlights of the latest franchising news.

Features

Bernard Madoff, Marital Agreements and Mutual Mistake

Elliott Scheinberg

<i>Simkin v. Blank</i>, a jarring Supreme Court decision, poses devastating consequences for divorcing couples who, unaware of Bernard Madoff's criminal enterprise, relied upon the accuracy of fraudulently generated portfolio statements.

Court Watch

Rupert M. Barkoff

Highlights of the latest franchising cases from around the country.

Third Department Says Court Should Entertain Civil Union Dissolution Case

Janice G. Inman

In March, the Appellate Division, Third Department, reversed a Schenectady County Supreme Court dismissal of a case seeking dissolution of a same-sex civil union, which was entered into in Vermont. Here are the implications of the ruling.

Med Mal News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The latest news you need to know.

Features

Verdicts

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.

Features

Drug & Device News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Up-to-date news.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Surveys in Patent Infringement Litigation: The Next Frontier
    Most experienced intellectual property attorneys understand the significant role surveys play in trademark infringement and other Lanham Act cases, but relatively few are likely to have considered the use of such research in patent infringement matters. That could soon change in light of the recent admission of a survey into evidence in <i>Applera Corporation, et al. v. MJ Research, Inc., et al.</i>, No. 3:98cv1201 (D. Conn. Aug. 26, 2005). The survey evidence, which showed that 96% of the defendant's customers used its products to perform a patented process, was admitted as evidence in support of a claim of inducement to infringe. The court admitted the survey into evidence over various objections by the defendant, who had argued that the inducement claim could not be proven without the survey.
    Read More ›