Film financing and film production can be long, slow processes. But deals for distribution rights may be struck up fast and furious, as seen from distribution interest in buzz movies at film festivals. This happened with Precious: Based on the Novel Push by Sapphire, a film about a young African-American mother in Harlem that won both the grand jury prize and audience award in drama at the Sundance Film Festival in January 2009. Hurried negotiations for the film distribution rights to Push has led to multi-suit litigation ' and a recent Manhattan federal district court ruling that may help define when there's a binding distribution deal.
- October 29, 2009Stan Soocher
Who's doing what; who's going where.
October 29, 2009ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Highlights of the latest franchising news from around the country.
October 29, 2009ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |Highlights of the latest franchising cases from around the country.
October 29, 2009Alexander TuneskiIt's time to take a leap and leave behind your firm's entrenched identity as a legal services provider: to succeed, you must start thinking of your firm as a media company.
October 29, 2009Nicholas GaffneyAt long last, marketing and communications can take center stage and become the key indicator by which law firms can measure their success ratio.
October 29, 2009Elizabeth Anne 'Betiayn' TursiHighlights of the latest intellectual property news from around the country.
October 29, 2009Howard J. Shire and Matthew BerkowitzThere are many ways that accepting a 2(f) notation can come back and haunt you once litigation has commenced.
October 29, 2009Stephen W. FeingoldTaking a page from the Federal Circuit's own analysis of the issue, we will examine the who, what, when, where (and why) of the decision in Exergen Corporation v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
October 29, 2009Gregory F. WesnerLess than two months before the Supreme Court is scheduled to review the Federal Circuit's en banc decision in In re Bilski that found Bilski's business method claims unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 101, the Federal Circuit held in Prometheus Labs., Inc. v. Mayo Collaborative Servs. (Fed. Cir. 2009) that claims to a diagnostic method are patent-eligible subject matter. The Federal Circuit reversed the district court's decision and held that Prometheus' personalized medicine claims satisfied the machine or transformation test set out in Bilski.
October 29, 2009Tammy Van Heyningen

