Recent rulings of interest to you and your practice.
- September 24, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
An analysis of the Second Chance Act of 2007, Pub. L. No. 110-199, 122 Stat. 657 (2008), which provides opportunities for white-collar offenders to reduce the amount of time spent in prison.
September 24, 2008Joseph F. Savage, Jr. and Abigail K. HemaniAfter much pressure from the defense bar, the judiciary and Congress, the DOJ issued new guidelines on prosecuting businesses on Aug. 28, 2008. A close look at the fine print, however, shows that not much has changed.
September 24, 2008Stanley S. Arkin, Peter B. Pope and Barrett N. PrinzIn a much anticipated opinion, the Second Circuit has affirmed the dismissal of an indictment against 13 former partners and employees of the accounting firm KPMG, who were charged with creating fraudulent tax shelters. United States v. Stein. This article discusses the case in depth.
September 24, 2008Laurence A. Urgenson and Jason P. HernandezWho's going where; who's doing what.
September 24, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |As part of making distributions to allowed claimants of a bankrupt entity, a liquidating trustee must decide the best way to handle potential outstanding tax liabilities. This article discusses the benefits of Section 505.
September 24, 2008Patrick M. Cox and Robert J. StarkThe Tenth Circuit held on July 15, 2008, that a major creditor with a seat on the debtor's board of directors and a 10.6% equity interest was not an insider in a bankruptcy preference suit. As shown in this article, the decision contains a road map for corporate insiders on how to avoid preference liability.
September 24, 2008Michael L. CookDespite all the recent media attention focused on bankruptcy concerns among the domestic three automakers, we do not anticipate any domestic OEM filing for bankruptcy protection. However, we anticipate increased bankruptcy activity within the supplier base in the latter part of 2008 and into 2009.
September 24, 2008Ben GonzalezAt one time or another, every trademark holder must deal with infringement on the Internet. After years of chasing individual infringers, many brand owners seek relief from those who provide the means for infringement. Yet these efforts have had limited success, at least in the United States. In some jurisdictions, search engines have avoided liability for sales of trademarks as keywords, under the doctrine of non-trademark use.
August 29, 2008Marc A. Lieberstein and Catherine D. O'ConnorPart One of this article provided background relating to IP disclosures in standard setting and discussed the Rambus decision. This month's installment addresses the impact of Rambus.
August 28, 2008John T. Delacourt and Christopher M. Loeffler

