Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

Fed Court Believes It Can't Consider Copyright Issue Image

Fed Court Believes It Can't Consider Copyright Issue

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ordered defendant Artisan Pictures to show cause why a suit against it for payment of film-acquisition rights shouldn't be remanded to state court. The federal court noted it 'likely lacks' subject matter jurisdiction over the declaratory suit, even though the case involves whether copyright claims over licenses for film music were time barred.

Features

Exploring the Substantial-Similarity Test in Suits Alleging Breach of Implied Contract Image

Exploring the Substantial-Similarity Test in Suits Alleging Breach of Implied Contract

Stan Soocher

Copyright-infringement cases alleging that a defendant improperly used a plaintiff's work for a movie or TV show often hinge on whether there's substantial similarity between the litigating parties' works. But substantial similarity plays a role in breach-of-implied-contract cases alleging defendants based their film or show on a plaintiff's work. A recent ruling by the California Court of Appeal serves as an informative review of California case law in this legal area and its current application.

Features

Think You Know What Constitutes Good Cause? Image

Think You Know What Constitutes Good Cause?

Kevin C. McCormick

Many employers believe that since they make the first call as to whether cause exists, that is the final call. However, as demonstrated by the jury verdict in a recent Maryland trial, it is the jury, not the employer, that gets to make the final call as to whether cause exists. <i>Kinsbourne, et al. v. 180's LLC.</i>

Features

DOL's New Proposed FMLA Regulations: They Help Employers, But Is It Enough? Image

DOL's New Proposed FMLA Regulations: They Help Employers, But Is It Enough?

Marisa Hudson-Arney & Danielle Kitson

Since the Department of Labor's regulations implementing the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 were first issued in 1995, they have caused a degree of consternation for employers navigating some of their more confusing aspects, and grappling with employee abuse. In an effort to add clarity, the DOL published new proposed changes to the regulations on Feb. 11, 2008. The proposed regulations clarify some uncertainties, but many remain.

Features

The Broken Covenant: A Retrospective -- 'Partners for Life'? Image

The Broken Covenant: A Retrospective -- 'Partners for Life'?

Jeffrey A. Lowe

This article examines the "Partners for Life" covenant and several of the factors that led to its demise.

Features

How to Prepare for a Live Presentation Image

How to Prepare for a Live Presentation

Sally Rosenberg Romansky

Delivering a live presentation with impact demands a particular type of preparation, whether you are addressing a room of hundreds or a client's small executive team. This article provides advice on how to craft such presentations.

Features

Bringing Lateral Attorneys on Board: A Blueprint for Success Image

Bringing Lateral Attorneys on Board: A Blueprint for Success

Bruce Jackson

The lateral movement of attorneys between firms requires a well-defined and well-executed management program in order to maximize the benefits of the move to both sides. This article sets forth the key elements, all of which must be addressed in order to maximize the investment a law firm makes in the lateral and in order to achieve career satisfaction and retention of lateral attorneys.

Features

Business Method Patents and State Street: Federal Circuit to Hear Supplemental Briefing Image

Business Method Patents and State Street: Federal Circuit to Hear Supplemental Briefing

Robert Blasi

On its own initiative in a pending appeal, the Federal Circuit has ordered supplemental briefing concerning the patentability of process claims and the Federal Circuit's 1998 decision in <i>State Street Bank &amp; Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.</i>, which eliminated the 'business method exception' to patentable subject matter.

e-Commerce Docket Sheet Image

e-Commerce Docket Sheet

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Registered Trademark Owner's Remedies Not Limited By Types of Goods<br>Domain Name with 'e' before Famous Mark Is Dilution<br>Failure to Produce Written Copyright Transfer Does Not Prevent Standing<br>Electing Statutory Damages For Counterfeit Mark Use Precludes Some Fees

Features

Federal Circuit Split Decision on 'Public Accessibility' of Internet Posting Image

Federal Circuit Split Decision on 'Public Accessibility' of Internet Posting

Warren D. Woessner & Tania Shapiro-Barr

Do Internet postings constitute 'printed publications' that are available as prior art under 35 U.S.C. &sect;102(b)? Most practitioners and examiners behave as though this were a settled question. It is not. The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently addressed this issue in <i>SRI International v. Internet Security Systems and Symantec</i>,. After much discussion of the principle of 'public accessibility,' the majority of the panel determined that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether a paper that SRI posted on its Internet server was a printed publication.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel
    'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
    Read More ›
  • Divorce Lawyers' Obligation to Children
    Do divorce lawyers have an obligation to disclose client confidences when it is in the best interests of the client's child to do so? The short answer of the rules of professional responsibility is 'no' because a 'yes' answer is deemed to be fundamentally inconsistent with the premises of the adversary system in which the divorce lawyer functions. The longer answer is that the rules encourage ' but do not require ' a divorce lawyer to counsel the client to authorize the disclosure because it is in the best interests of both parent and child.
    Read More ›
  • Upping the Legal Training Ante
    Womble Carlyle's technology training and online learning programs were in need of an upgrade. Unprecedented firm growth, heightened emphasis on developing lawyers' core technology competencies, and a need to streamline and automate existing e-learning processes led the firm to initiate a fundamental shift.
    Read More ›