Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Register

LJN Newsletters

  • Whether or not to adjust the number of employees or partners downward can be a critical decision for 2008. In the event it does happen, marketing executives will, undoubtedly, be asked to help craft appropriate messages to both the market and within their own firms in advance of rumor mills, blogs, and especially, the competitors offering their own take on the changes. However daunting the task, working through such scenarios can go a long way toward preserving your firm's reputation and bolstering your own career opportunities within your current firm or with a prospective employer.

    March 27, 2008Michael DeCosta
  • FILM PRODUCTION/DEFAMATION
    FILM PRODUCTION/TRADEMARKS, DEFAMATION
    KARAOKE LICENSES/LANHAM ACT, COPYRIGHT CLAIMS

    March 27, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Celebrity Indicia/Licensee's Web Site
    Film Exhibition/Use Tax
    Film Production/Copyright, Unfair-Competition Claims
    Right of Publicity/Counting Statutory Claims

    March 27, 2008Stan Soocher
  • Text messages, cell phones, TV game shows, Howie Mandel ' none of these could have been contemplated by Georgia's colonial lawmakers when they first passed a law allowing gamblers to recover their losses through lawsuits. The current version of the law is at the center of a case against NBC Universal and the producer of Mandel's hit show, 'Deal or No Deal,' now being considered by the Georgia Supreme Court.

    March 27, 2008Alyson M. Palmer
  • Those who download music to their computers now have two unlikely heroes. One is Janet Bond Arterton, a federal judge who sits in New Haven, CT. The other is Christopher David Brennan, a young Waterford, CT, resident who, among other artists, has reportedly downloaded songs by Billy Joel and Hootie and the Blowfish.

    March 27, 2008Thomas B. Scheffey
  • Sonnenschein Team Leaves to Found MSK NY Office
    TV-Company Deal Highlights U.S. Risk Allocation

    March 27, 2008Kellie Schmitt and Petra Pasternak
  • The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ordered defendant Artisan Pictures to show cause why a suit against it for payment of film-acquisition rights shouldn't be remanded to state court. The federal court noted it 'likely lacks' subject matter jurisdiction over the declaratory suit, even though the case involves whether copyright claims over licenses for film music were time barred.

    March 27, 2008ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Copyright-infringement cases alleging that a defendant improperly used a plaintiff's work for a movie or TV show often hinge on whether there's substantial similarity between the litigating parties' works. But substantial similarity plays a role in breach-of-implied-contract cases alleging defendants based their film or show on a plaintiff's work. A recent ruling by the California Court of Appeal serves as an informative review of California case law in this legal area and its current application.

    March 27, 2008Stan Soocher