Not long ago, the operative question in cybersecurity planning was whether organizations needed to plan for AI-assisted attacks. Five national cybersecurity agencies have now answered that question, on the record, with a timeline measured in months, not years.
Trespass and Nuisance Claims Against Easement-Holding Stadium Survive Motion to DismissEvidence Supports Invalidity of DeedReferee’s Partition Support ConfirmedAttorney General’s Motion To Stay Partition Action UpheldConstructive Trust Claim Not Subject to Statute of Frauds
Legal leaders should be asking themselves if AI is making legal a more effective business partner. The legal teams pulling ahead aren’t necessarily those deploying the most AI. They’re the ones using it to remove friction across the business in ways everyone can see.
The future of law firm marketing is an integrated team of AI, experts and managed services.
Legal doesn’t operate in isolation. Every contract review, approval, and negotiation is part of a broader business process. If AI isn’t making those processes faster, more transparent, and easier to navigate, it isn’t making legal meaningfully more effective.
The Goldman Sachs decision may offer a path through the longstanding conflict: beyond asking whether a dispute is core, future courts may use the Supreme Court’s analysis in Stern to assess whether the dispute lies within the bankruptcy court’s constitutionally protected sphere of authority.
This article surveys the contours of puffery across federal and state advertising law, examines where courts and the National Advertising Division (a unit of BBB National Programs, which provides a self-regulatory forum for advertising disputes) have drawn the line, and identifies practical takeaways for practitioners whose clients want to puff — but not too much.
Concluding that AI will eliminate the attorney reviewer, or even the broader document review market, misses a much larger change underway. The question is not simply how many people it takes to analyze a million documents. The more interesting question is: What happens when analyzing information becomes dramatically less expensive?
A federal case arising from the popular Roblox game Steal a Brainrot touches on the questions of: What are some ways in which creatives and media companies capitalize on viral content? Can IP law keep pace with AI-driven Internet culture? And why are gamers so obsessed with a club-wielding piece of lumber?
One area that has been the subject of much litigation concerns when a debtor can sell general and limited partnership interests, as well as its role as the manager of the partnership’s business. This issue was addressed recently in a decision by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas in In re Genesis Healthcare.
© Copyright 2026 ALM Global, LLC trading as Centellic.
Advertise with Us Customer Support Terms of Service Privacy Policy
