Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

LJN Newsletters

  • In-depth analysis and discussion of several important rulings.

    August 01, 2017ljnstaff
  • Analysis of a case in which a prescribed drug allegedly contributed to a young man's death.

    August 01, 2017ljnstaff
  • Traps for the Unwary or Lifesavers for the Unlucky?

    The WARN Act contains several affirmative defenses that provide employers with a complete defense to liability under the statute when a company's exigent condition forces an immediate cessation of operations. This article identifies the key features (including the benefits and drawbacks) of each.

    July 07, 2017David Van Pelt
  • This edition of the Quarterly State Compliance Review looks at some legislation of interest to corporate lawyers that went into effect between May 1 and July 1, as well as some recent cases of interest from the courts of Delaware, Michigan, and Texas.

    July 02, 2017Sandra Feldman
  • Supreme Court Turns Back Clock

    Although TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods answers the question of where a domestic corporation resides in patent infringement cases, it does not fully answer the question of where proper venue lies.

    July 02, 2017Christopher Gaspar and Sean Hyberg
  • There are pitfalls for providers and companies that offer genomic testing. They might include not offering genetic testing if it is indicated, not offering the proper testing, or reporting inaccurate or misleading results. Each of these has the potential to generate a lawsuit, and indeed each of them already has.

    July 02, 2017Linda S. Crawford
  • The ransomware attack on June 27 on DLA Piper sounded an alarm for Big Law. The world's biggest firms are just as prone to ransomware attacks as any other company, and the potential ramifications of a network-crippling malware infection are wide-ranging for a service industry that holds the legal fate of corporations in its palm.

    July 02, 2017Roy Strom