Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Register

LJN Newsletters

  • Analysis and interpretation of five recent rulings.

    August 02, 2014ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • The concept of "good faith" exists in most civil law jurisdictions but is frequently interpreted in different ways. Common law jurisdictions, such as the United States, however, generally have an uneasy relationship with the concept of a duty of good faith, as is illustrated by the case law and proposed legislation.

    August 02, 2014Mark Abell and Beata Krakus
  • When a breach of the data occurs and confidential information is accessed by unauthorized persons, the financial consequences to the business entity may be substantial. But when that business seeks defense and indemnification from its insurer, the insurer just might push back.

    August 02, 2014Ellen Farrell and Kathryn Linsky
  • The future of the legal industry isn't what it used to be. Or so says a recent report issued by Law2023.org, a group of industry insiders ' including the author' who spent a year studying the trajectory of the legal marketplace.

    August 02, 2014Timothy B. Corcoran
  • In-depth discussion of several key cases.

    August 02, 2014ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • Lawyers leaving a law practice have an economic interest in monetizing their career-long investment in building a client portfolio and a referral network. How each lawyer has accomplished this depends on his or her particular practice, market and style. But while the means may vary, the results are the same ' access to clients who have legal needs. And this is the value the acquirers wish to capture.

    August 02, 2014James D. Cotterman
  • Discussion of a case in which a Texas law firm filed a defamation lawsuit over an ex-client's negative Yelp review.

    August 02, 2014ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
  • In June, a 6-3 majority of the U.S. Supreme Court held that Aereo's streaming service ' which allowed customers to view over-the-air TV broadcasts via the Internet ' violated the broadcasters' public performance right under the Copyright Act. Applying what the dissent derided as "an improvised standard ('looks-like-cable-TV')," the majority held that Aereo infringed copyrights owned by the television networks.

    August 02, 2014Mitchell Zimmerman