Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Features

Med Mal News Image

Med Mal News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Several cases are discussed.

Features

Drug & Device News Image

Drug & Device News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Analysis of several important happenings.

Features

Third Parties at Court-Ordered Psychological Evaluations Image

Third Parties at Court-Ordered Psychological Evaluations

Janice G. Inman

What can litigants, their attorneys, and their medical examiners expect from the courts when conflicts over third-party presence during a court-ordered psychiatric examination arise?

The Role of the Mediator in Med Mal Cases Image

The Role of the Mediator in Med Mal Cases

Roseann Lynn Brenner

Tips to make the mediation process smooth and profitable.

Features

A Roadmap to Economic Damages in Med Mal Matters Image

A Roadmap to Economic Damages in Med Mal Matters

Chad L. Staller

A good understanding of the basic elements of damages and the issues that might be involved is essential to effective representation. Here is an in-depth review.

Verdicts Image

Verdicts

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Analysis of an important ruling.

Med Mal News Image

Med Mal News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

Several items of interest.

Features

Drug & Device News Image

Drug & Device News

ALM Staff & Law Journal Newsletters

A discussion of several key cases.

The Role of the Mediator in Med-Mal Cases Image

The Role of the Mediator in Med-Mal Cases

Roseann Lynn Brenner

For litigants today, faced with the potential of a long and drawn-out jury trial, along with the uncertainties that accompany such an exercise, mediation is becoming a very important alternative in the dispute resolution process.

Whistleblowing and Peer Review Image

Whistleblowing and Peer Review

David M. Axelrad, Peder K. Batalden & H. Thomas Watson

Last month, we discussed the fact that one long-settled aspect of the California Supreme Court's peer-review jurisprudence is the exhaustion-of-remedies doctrine. We stated that two of California's intermediate appellate courts addressed doctors' whistleblower claims ' with diametrically opposed results.

Need Help?

  1. Prefer an IP authenticated environment? Request a transition or call 800-756-8993.
  2. Need other assistance? email Customer Service or call 1-877-256-2472.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
    With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
    Read More ›
  • The Article 8 Opt In
    The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
    Read More ›
  • The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
    UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?
    Read More ›