The Survey Says...
Preliminary results from our legal spending survey shows general counsel balancing an increased need for outside counsel with pressure to reduce costs.
Courts Turn Up Corporate Heat
The highly publicized accounting scandals at Enron, WorldCom and other large corporations have prompted a concerted legislative and regulatory response from Congress, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the national securities exchanges. While there has been little in the way of legislative reaction at the state level, several recent court decisions reflect that state corporate law is not immune from the impact of these scandals. Using existing judicial doctrine, but applying it in a fashion that appears to indicate an increasing toughness with respect to corporate directors and officers who do not live up to their obligations, the judiciary has turned up the heat on corporate fiduciaries.
Hotline
Recent developments of interest to corporate counsel.
What Not to Do in ADA Cases
A recent case in the Federal District Court for the District of Maine offers in-house counsel and others providing employment law advice to corporate clients with a lesson in what not to do when faced with an employee suffering from a mental health disability and seeking leave for hospitalization as an accommodation.
Talent Management: Three Controversial Practices Debated
Making the most of your law department talent calls for the utmost in managerial ability. This series has offered some ideas for how to do so. This article discusses three controversial practices: forced rankings, telecommuting and job sharing.
Hotline
Recent developments of interest to corporate counsel.
Litigation Traps in Purchasing a Business
When prospective purchasers of businesses don't perform a thorough due diligence on the sellers, the result can be unneeded and protracted litigation. Due diligence should include investigation into trade secrets, other potential purchasers, covenants not to compete, seller's liabilities and insurance coverage. The purchaser should consider all 'what ifs' including claims and remedies during the due diligence period. What if the seller defaults? What if the seller breaches the representations and warranties? What if the seller violates the covenant not to compete? What if the seller discloses or has already disclosed to others acquired trade secret information? Paying too much too early to a seller without substantial assets or sufficient holdbacks are red flags. In the event of a seller's breach and purchaser's lawsuit, any resulting judgment may be uncollectible.
Supreme Court Once Again Addresses Issue of Punitive Damages
Punitive damages, traditionally a form of compensation awarded to punish the wrongdoer and simultaneously deter future misconduct, have long been a divisive issue within American law and business. For the former, centuries of law recognize the efficacy of a sizeable financial punishment, deliberately outsized in order to properly punish a larger wrong, and to make the miscreant and others similarly minded think twice before doing it again. The public policy has long outweighed the possibility that the particular victim may be rewarded with a recovery usually well in excess of the actual harm suffered. Yet business, particularly large corporations, contend that awards of punitive damages have grown monsterous, and completely out of proportion to the harm suffered. Defying rationality, such damages threaten the very existence of the business defendant, and only give windfalls to undeserving and avaricious plaintiffs and their counsel.
Qualified Legal Compliance Committees: A Useful Tool For Investigating Reports Of Material Violations
Section 307 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires the Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) to adopt new standards governing the conduct of attorneys who represent public companies before the Commission. On January 23, 2003, the Commission adopted final rules to implement Section 307. The rules, which become effective on August 5, 2003, establish minimum standards of professional conduct for attorneys appearing and practicing before the Commission in the representation of an issuer as well as reporting procedures that must be followed if an attorney becomes aware of a 'material violation.' As discussed herein, establishing a Qualified Legal Compliance Committee (QLCC) could save issuers valuable time and create a more controlled and efficient process in identifying and rectifying potential material violations.
