Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search


Occurrence Limits Under Multi-Year Policies: NJ Courts Are Changing Their Approach
July 31, 2006
In complex coverage cases involving 'long-tail' claims (such as asbestos bodily injury claims or property damage claims related to environmental pollution), decades of insurance policies can be put at issue. In many states, the policyholder's losses will be spread across the years in which the injury or property damage occurred on a proportionate basis, typically referred to as 'time on the risk' or pro rata allocation. <i>E.g., Security Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.</i>, 826 A.2d 107, 116 (Conn. 2003); <i>Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Cas. &amp; Sur. Co.</i>, 931 P.2d 127, 141 (Utah 1997); <i>Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.</i>, 633 F.2d 1212, 1224-25 (6th Cir. 1980).
Courts Favor Insurers in Airport Cases Seeking Civil Authority Coverage After 9/11
July 31, 2006
On the morning of 9/11, the Federal Aviation Administration reacted to the unfolding national disaster by issuing a 'ground stop order' of all aircraft departures regardless of destination. This ground stop order was lifted on Sept. 14, 2001. Due to the events of 9/11, numerous policyholders sought coverage under first-party property policies for coverage of their business interruption losses related to operations at the country's airports. The policyholders claimed that the ground stop order or other governmental orders closed the airports and gave rise to coverage under their policies' Civil Authority provision. Based on varying policy language, insurers resisted these claims on several grounds, including that 1) the ground stop order did not bar access to the airports, 2) the ground stop order was not issued due to property damage, and 3) the ground stop order was not issued due to damage to the insured's property or to adjacent property.
News Briefs
July 31, 2006
Highlights of the latest franchising news from around the country.
Court Watch
July 31, 2006
Highlights of the latest franchising cases from around the country.
Access to SBA Contracts
July 31, 2006
Under current U.S. Small Business Administration ('SBA') regulations, franchisees and licensees are not, by virtue of their contractual franchise and license agreements alone, ineligible to bid on small business set-aside procurement contracts or to apply for SBA loans. Although franchise or license relationships do not make franchisees or licensees automatically ineligible, they are cause for affiliation scrutiny by the SBA or protesting bidders if a franchisee or licensee is the successful bidder on a procurement or is an applicant for an SBA loan.
Anticipated New Federal Rules on Electronic Discovery
July 31, 2006
The following is a summary of key issues addressed by Paul Reeve and Jonathan Solish in a session about electronic discovery that they led at the 2006 International Franchise Association Legal Symposium in Washington, DC. The summary was prepared by the authors of the presentation.
Increasing Competition in China Causes Friction for Law Firms
July 31, 2006
To U.S. lawyers, Becky Xia's career move may not make much sense. <br>Earlier this year, the 27-year-old Chinese immigration lawyer leapt at the chance to join Littler Global, even though ' technically speaking ' doing so meant she could no longer practice law.
Increased Piracy Puts More Heat on China
July 31, 2006
The entertainment industry hoped the counterfeiting of movies, music, software and books would plummet after China agreed in 2002 to abide by the World Trade Organization's (WTO) standards for global intellectual property rights. Instead, the industry says piracy has increased dramatically, leading some American companies to view the Chinese government as unable ' or unwilling ' to curb it. And industry lobbyists are now helping the U.S. government prepare a case that could be brought&#133;
Doing Business in China via the Cayman Islands (2006 Update)
July 31, 2006
Many companies doing business in China are using a structure that includes a company formed under the laws of the Cayman Islands (CI). Chinese technology and Internet companies listed on NASDAQ ' such as Actions Semiconductor, Baidu, CTrip, China Medical Technologies, Focus Media, Shanda, Suntech Power and Tom Online ' are actually CI companies. The primary business reasons for an offshore structure are flexibility in an exit strategy, whether in connection with an initial public offering (IPO) or an acquisition; the possibility of reducing U.S. taxes; and reducing the impact of China's currency exchange restrictions.
Compliance Hotline
July 31, 2006
Recent rulings of interest to your practice.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Meet the Lawyer Working on Inclusion Rider Language
    At the Oscars in March, Best Actress winner Frances McDormand made “inclusion rider” go viral. But Kalpana Kotagal, a partner at Cohen Milstein Sellers &amp; Toll had already worked for months to write the language for such provisions. Kotagal was developing legal language for contract provisions that Hollywood's elite could use to require studios and other partners to employ diverse workers on set.
    Read More ›
  • Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel
    'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.
    Read More ›