The Valuation of Marital Assets
June 28, 2006
Last month, we explained that a matrimonial action may be commenced by the filing of a summons with notice, and without a verified complaint. Because New York requires fault allegations in the complaint, it had become common practice to stipulate to defer the service of a complaint. We asked the question: 'Can the commencement date of a prior discontinued or dismissed action be used as the date to classify property, or as the valuation date of marital assets in a subsequent divorce action? In Part Two, we continue the discussion.
Court Hears Arguments on Same-Sex Marriage
June 28, 2006
The Court of Appeals heard spirited arguments May 31 on whether New York should become the second state to legalize gay marriage. The judges did little to tip their hands as to how they would vote, greeting both sides with wide-ranging, skeptical questions. The arguments covered the four joined decisions that each held that New York state law precludes same-sex couples from marrying: the First Department case <i>Hernandez v. Robles</i>, 805 NYS 2d 354 and the Third Department cases <i>Seymour v. Holcomb</i>, 811 NYS 2d 134; <i>Matter of Kane v. Marsolais</i>, 808 NYS 2d 566; and <i>Samuels v. New York State Department of Health</i>, 811 NYS 2d 136. Judge Albert M. Rosenblatt recused himself, reportedly because his daughter, a Los Angeles attorney, has worked on same-sex marriages cases in New Jersey and California. That left only six judges to hear arguments.
Divorce and the Military
June 28, 2006
One of the least understood areas of law that New York matrimonial lawyers may encounter is the equitable distribution of military benefits. This is largely due to the relatively small number of military personnel who have traditionally resided in New York, the even smaller number of military personnel who divorce here, the paucity of the decisions dealing with them, and the lack of sufficient interest to spark Continuing Legal Education providers in this state to devote attention to the subject. Still, there are more than a few military personnel in New York, so any attorney may one day find him/herself having to decipher the intricacies of federal military retirement and disability laws on behalf of a client. Therefore, an understanding of each of the military benefits that can be distributed upon divorce and the circumstances under which they can be distributed may one day prove useful.
The Shifting Landscape of e-Discovery
June 28, 2006
This month, we bring you another in a continuing series of articles on the U.S. Supreme Court-approved proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which become effective Dec. 1 ' unless Congress acts to veto or alter them. Last month, two guest authors explored and defined the concept of accessible and inaccessible electronically stored information as defined by the new rules. This month's article expands on some aspects of that discussion, and provides a new discussion of some elements related to the production and handling, and the disclosure and protection of e-discovery data, including confidential information, under amended Rule 37, and briefly ponders the possible guidance that recently issued Sedona Conference guidelines may provide judges.
Verdicts
June 28, 2006
Recent rulings of interest to your practice.
Med Mal News
June 28, 2006
The latest news of importance to you and your practice.
The Art and Science of Culling Data by Keyword
June 28, 2006
e-Discovery is a large process that has become many smaller ones, each requiring expert and diligent attention. Culling large data sets by keyword is no different from other elements of e-discovery projects, except, unfortunately, in one sense: Although it's a process in electronic-discovery projects, it's one that too often doesn't receive the time or consideration it deserves.
Peer Review Proceedings Are Not Always Confidential
June 28, 2006
The peer review process is indispensable to promotion of quality in medical facilities. A major component of the process is honesty; without open investigation and discussion of adverse events and their causes, meaningful reforms for avoiding the same occurrences again are less likely to be made. To ensure open discourse, nearly every state has enacted laws protecting the confidentiality of peer review proceedings. However, federal law may not always be so deferent to the privacy concerns of the peer review committee. In certain circumstances, what most participants thought would be a closed record under state law might be opened by competing federal law enacted to protect the disabled.
