Strengthening the Patent System
January 03, 2005
America's patent system is at a crossroads. There are many critics of the patent system; some have become increasingly vocal. Some claim the patent system is outdated. Others label it as a "threat to innovation." As fodder for their arguments, critics often tout examples of one or more patents that, in the words of one academic, are "not new, are obvious, are laughably insipid or sometimes all of the above" ("Patent Prescription: A radical cure for the ailing U.S. patent system," A. Jaffe and J. Lerner, IEEE Spectrum Online, Dec. 10, 2004).
Leasing: The Next Generation
December 30, 2004
At the launch of its annual sales meeting, a senior executive of an international company remarked that if the payment obligation had a hell or high water payment obligation, his company would try to finance it.
The Case of the Quiet Recall: CPSC's 2004 Civil Penalty Cases Hit 'Do-It-Yourself' Corrective Actions
December 29, 2004
In 1997, a company named Sun-It (a subsidiary of E&B Giftware) manufactured and distributed some 47,000 citronella candles known as the "Money to Burn Torch." As it happened, the wrapper surrounding the candle collected superheated melted wax. Some consumers reported to Sun-It that they had suffered serious burns when they blew on the candles or bumped into them. Others said that they had been burned when the candles unexpectedly flared. In all, over a period of 5 months, Sun-It received notice of 14 incidents in which consumers claimed to have suffered serious burns and permanent scarring after having been scalded by hot wax from the candles. Sun-It responded to these reports by stopping sale of the candles and recalling candles that remained in retail inventories. Nearly 17,000 candles, including roughly 3300 in unshipped inventory ' more than a third of the total production ' were recalled and destroyed.
Tax Alert: Compensation And Benefits
December 27, 2004
Qualified retirement plans that provide immediate 'cash-out' distributions to a terminated participant if the vested benefit is $5000 or less will have to be amended to comply with Department of Labor (DOL) final regulations.
Appreciation in Separate Real Property As Marital Property
December 27, 2004
The increase in value of a titled spouse's separate property is subject to equitable distribution as marital property "to the extent that such appreciation is due in part to the contributions or efforts of the other spouse." D.R.L. ' 236 (B)(1)(d)(3). The Court of Appeals has repeatedly determined that a broad interpretation be given to this exclusion so as to favor the inclusion of such appreciation as marital property: "We hold that under the Equitable Distribution Law an increase in the value of separate property of one spouse, occurring during the marriage and prior to the commencement of matrimonial proceedings, which is due in part to the indirect contributions or efforts of the other spouse as homemaker and parent, should be considered marital property.
Around the Firms
December 27, 2004
London firm DLA and the partners of Piper Rudnick started off December with a vote to merge the two firms, and thus the New Year brings about the world's third-largest law firm measured by lawyers ' and fifth-largest measured by revenues.
Making Merged Firms Work As One
December 27, 2004
Finding a merger candidate can be a daunting process. However, integrating a merged group of attorneys into a "new" firm's culture, practice environment and organizational structure so that attorneys from both firms work as one may be a greater challenge.
Challenges And Adjustments In A Merger
December 27, 2004
There is a drama that is acted out every day on the stages of hundreds of law firms throughout the world. Firm A, which may have been a local, regional or even national firm, has recently merged into (read "acquired by") Firm B, a larger national or international firm, and the partners from Firm A are adjusting to being part of such a huge firm. <br>There are many pluses to becoming part of a much larger firm ' but there are also many differences and challenges. If the merger is to be successful, the partners in Firm A must anticipate the differences and challenges and Firm B must recognize them.
