Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search


The Duty to Preserve Electronic Business Records
August 31, 2004
For companies in highly regulated industries, lawsuits and government investigations are a cost of doing business. This cost goes well beyond the fees for lawyers, experts and consultants. In the early stages of a lawsuit or investigation, much of it comes from the diversion of personnel from their business responsibilities to complying with requests for information made by an adverse party or the government. Instead of running the business, employees spend their time meeting with lawyers and reviewing historical records.
The Blakely Effect: Managing the Uncertainty
August 31, 2004
On June 24th, the Supreme Court decided a case that has sent a virtual shock-wave through the criminal justice system and threatens to upset the long-established practice of sentencing defendants under the federal Sentencing Guidelines. In <i>Blakely v. Washington</i>, 124 S.Ct. 2531 (2004), the Court invalidated a defendant's sentence imposed under the State of Washington's sentencing guidelines by holding that the Sixth Amendment prohibits a judge from increasing a defendant's sentence based on facts beyond those found by the jury or admitted by the defendant.
Order in the Court: Limits on the Court's Preservation of Debtor Assets
August 31, 2004
Telecom companies invest substantial amounts to acquire their assets, such as underground cables or fiber optic networks. As a consequence of building or acquiring this capital-intensive infrastructure, telecom companies often pay millions of dollars in annual property tax assessments. When telecom asset values drop (as has most recently been the case), telecom companies generally focus on keeping their businesses afloat, rather than on their property taxes.
From Cradle to Grave
August 31, 2004
Bankruptcy lawyers may not get involved in their clients' transactions until it is too late. They may be called in only upon the occurrence of a default, litigation, or the commencement of a bankruptcy case. At that point, they are faced with deals that have been "set in stone" -- drafted and structured by lawyers specializing in the front-end, who may have looked at the transaction from an overly optimistic viewpoint, especially in the case of a long-term deal with another party that presently is in good financial health.
Bankruptcy Courts Allowed to Reopen Section 363 Auctions
August 31, 2004
A bankruptcy judge's mandate, and the purpose of a section 363 sale process, is to obtain the "highest and best" offer for the assets. Finality and integrity of the process are also important policy considerations. Bankruptcy sales are designed to facilitate the estate's ready realization of value from its assets, while at the same time giving purchasers some degree of certainty that they will obtain clear title to an asset, without the fear of having the transaction later reversed. At times, however, these principles may be in conflict, as outlined by the Seventh Circuit.
The Bankruptcy Hotline
August 31, 2004
The latest rulings of interest to you and your practice.
New Proposed Franchise Rule Released
August 30, 2004
On August 25, the Federal Trade Commission released a proposed final rule, 'Disclosure Requirements and Prohibitions Concerning Franchising and Business Opportunity Ventures," known more commonly as the "Franchise Rule." FBLA's editorial staff is now working on an in-depth analysis of the Franchise Rule in a special report that will be distributed to all subscribers. To read the proposed Franchise Rule, go to the FTC's Web site at <a href="http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/08/franchiserule.htm">www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/08/franchiserule.htm. </a>
The Applicability Of The WARN Act To Law Firms
August 16, 2004
In addition to its obligations to its clients and creditors, a law firm partnership which is in dissolution, or about to merge or be sold, may have certain statutory obligations to its employees. In recent years there has been litigation surrounding whether the Workers Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN) is applicable to partnerships, and in particular, law firm partnerships.
Outsiders As Overseers
August 16, 2004
In the wake of Enron, WorldCom, and other corporate scandals, corporate governance has come under the microscope. One reform that has been widely endorsed is the election of more independent, outside, nonexecutive directors to boards of publicly owned corporations. Outside corporate directors provide not only accountability but also perspective, diverse experience, and credibility. <br>Law firms might well benefit from outside directors in the same way. Indeed, some non-U.S. firms have already done so.
Look Before You Leap
August 16, 2004
One of the most difficult decisions any partner faces is whether to make a lateral move. Unlike associate lateral moves, which are relatively straightforward and can be accomplished in as little as one week, the issues facing partners are far more complex, and the process can typically take three to four months ' sometimes much longer. <BR>Before making the leap, partners should consider these questions.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes
    “Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
    Read More ›
  • Private Equity Valuation: A Significant Decision
    Insiders (and others) in the private equity business are accustomed to seeing a good deal of discussion ' academic and trade ' on the question of the appropriate methods of valuing private equity positions and securities which are otherwise illiquid. An interesting recent decision in the Southern District has been brought to our attention. The case is <i>In Re Allied Capital Corp.</i>, CCH Fed. SEC L. Rep. 92411 (US DC, S.D.N.Y., Apr. 25, 2003). Judge Lynch's decision is well written, the Judge reviewing a motion to dismiss by a business development company, Allied Capital, against a strike suit claiming that Allied's method of valuing its portfolio failed adequately to account for i) conditions at the companies themselves and ii) market conditions. The complaint appears to be, as is often the case, slap dash, content to point out that Allied revalued some of its positions, marking them down for a variety of reasons, and the stock price went down - all this, in the view of plaintiff's counsel, amounting to violations of Rule 10b-5.
    Read More ›