Litigation
Recent rulings of importance to you and your practice.
Spousal Opportunity: Does It Exist?
Shortly after the entry of a divorce judgment, matrimonial litigants walk away with their respective pieces of the marital estate (sometimes with support or distributive payments to follow) and begin separate lives with separate interests. However, without adequate protections under the law, the value of the marital estate before that pivotal moment (and the value of each litigant's post-termination estate) could have been diminished by the actions of the other spouse. For this reason, some concept of a fiduciary obligation between spouses exists in the majority of the states. Whether in equitable distribution jurisdictions or community property jurisdictions "spouses must manage marital property with care shortly before the termination of the marriage to ensure that the full value of the marital estate gets divided justly according to the prevailing system of distribution.
California AG Opposes Gay Marriage on Grounds of Tradition
Lawyers for two Christian legal groups, the Liberty Counsel and the Alliance Defense Fund, were not satisfied with Attorney General Bill Lockyer's first meaty arguments in defense of California's marriage laws. The two groups rushed to the courthouse to try to stop San Francisco's same-sex marriages last winter. They want to be more than amici in the case -- they want to take part as parties to the litigation. As <i>amici</i>, the groups would be able to submit written arguments, and perhaps take part in oral argument; however, if they are considered parties, they would be able to argue orally, enter evidence, cross-examine witnesses and participate in strategy
More on Same-Sex Relationships
The recent developments in the creation and recognition of relationships among same-sex couples have developed a momentum which, like it or not - the recent laws passed by 13 states banning gay marriage, notwithstanding - must be recognized and understood by family lawyers and other related practitioners in the areas of tax, estate planning, adoption, and other financial and interpersonal disciplines. <i>See</i> Wilson R: The Changing and Conflicting State of Same-Sex Marriage. <i>The Matrimonial Strategist</i>, November 2004.
No Separate Tort Suit Against Ex
A New York couple's short marriage may have a lasting effect on New York state law. The Appellate Division, Second Department, said a tort suit between spouses cannot be filed separately from, and after, a divorce action; the claim must be joined to the divorce suit. Accordingly, the court upheld the dismissal of a suit filed by a woman against her soon-to- be-ex-husband for intentional infliction of emotional distress and personal injuries on the basis of claim preclusion. <i>Chen v. Fischer</i>, 2003-00397.
Client Internet Services Expose Firms To New Liability
More and more attorneys are offering ' and their clients requesting- client services that include offering clients secure access to their personal case information by means of the Internet. Some law firms find such Internet Web site-based offerings to be a rapid, efficient and cost-effective method of communicating with clients, as well as other lawyers. Nevertheless, offering these services is not without an increase in legal liability for the law firm. Using the Internet to disperse confidential information raises potential ethical and legal issues that lawyers must face, with as of now, little guidance from the courts or bar associations.
Congress Reinstates Internet Access Tax Ban
The U.S. Congress recently reinstated a ban on Internet access taxes after the House of Representatives agreed to extend it for another 3 years rather than make it permanent.
Fair Use Goes On The Offensive
Courts and law professors often praise "fair use" as the counterweight that keeps copyright balanced with free expression. Those who actually litigate fair use cases, however, will tell you a very different story. They will tell you that, when it comes to copyright cases, it's the copyright owner that has all the advantages. <br>Thanks to the recent federal district court ruling in Online Policy <i>Group v. Diebold</i>, however, the times they may be a-changin'. Fair users on the Internet can now go on the offensive to vindicate their free speech interests against overzealous copyright owners.
Net News
Recent developments of note in the Internet industry.<br>This month:<br>Google Sues Internet Marketer Over False Ad Clicks <br>Movie Studios Take Cue From Record Industry ' File Suit against File-sharers <br>Another 761 Added To RIAA Tally <br>Perfect 10 Says Google Removes the Towel
