Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search


<b>Decision of Note:</b><b>Agency Contract Found Properly Disaffirmed</b>
June 01, 2004
A Manhattan federal district court granted summary judgment dismissing a claim against a Canadian modeling agency for tortious interference with contract. <i>NYC Management Group Inc. v. Brown-Miller</i>. The defendant had secured New York agency representation from the plaintiff's modeling agency for 16-year-old Jessica Stam, who later disaffirmed the minor's contract based on her unhappiness with the plaintiff's agency.
Editing Software Reignites Ire Of Film Directors
June 01, 2004
This spring, RCA launched a DVD player that includes a software program by ClearPlay Inc. that is preprogrammed to filter out nudity, sex, violence and harsh language from hundreds of movies ranging from "Lost in Translation" to "The Cat in the Hat." <br>The technology has created a furor in Hollywood, with a group of 16 prominent directors ' including Stephen Spielberg, Martin Scorsese, Robert Redford and Stephen Soderbergh ' teaming up with seven motion picture studios to get it off the market. The directors claim the editing violates their trademarks by mutilating and diluting their movies, while the studios argue it infringes their copyrights by creating derivative works.
Cameo Clips
June 01, 2004
Recent cases in entertainment law.
Courthouse Steps
June 01, 2004
Recently filed cases in entertainment law, straight from the steps of the Los Angeles Superior Court.
Attorney Fees Update
June 01, 2004
Depending on the circumstances and the law, parties on either side of an entertainment suit may ask a court for an award of attorney fees. Following are recent court rulings that deal with this and related concerns. In this and future issues, <i>Entertainment Law &amp; Finance</i> will report on such relevant rulings in Attorney-Fee Updates.
Bit Parts
June 01, 2004
Recent developments in entertainment law.
Arbitration Update
June 01, 2004
Many contracts in the entertainment industry include arbitration clauses. <i>EL&amp;F</i> will periodically provide updates on how courts are interpreting and enforcing these clauses and appeals to arbitrators' rulings.
Pop-up Advertisement Litigation Strategies
June 01, 2004
Originally, e-commerce businesses relied on banner advertising that appeared on Internet sites when users visited. Next, e-commerce merchants found that unsolicited bulk e-mailing (a.k.a. spam) was more effective, because it could be sent to Internet e-mail users. Now, e-commerce professionals have found that "pop-up" ads are more effective still, because they can be sent to every Internet user. Pop-up ads are advertisements that spontaneously appear on a personal computer screen when an Internet user accesses the Internet. Currently there is no effective regulation of pop-up advertisements and until their actions are regulated, civil litigation is the most viable option to stop pop-ups advertisements from invading the privacy of unknowing and unwilling Internet users.
Net News
June 01, 2004
Cases and news of interest in the Internet industry. This month: Feds Reject 'Do-Not-Spam' list ... and more!
The RIAA's New Frontier
June 01, 2004
In response to the Verizon decision, the RIAA has turned to the use of "John/Jane Doe" lawsuits as the mechanism by which to identify file-sharing customers of ISPs and obtain judicial relief against copyright infringement. Since January, and continuing through the end of last month, the RIAA has filed hundreds of lawsuits against "Doe" defendants in federal district courts around the country.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
    This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
    Read More ›
  • "Holy Fair Use, Batman": Copyright, Fair Use and the Dark Knight
    The copyright for the original versions of Winnie the Pooh and Mickey Mouse have expired. Now, members of the public can create — and are busy creating — their own works based on these beloved characters. Suppose, though, we want to tell stories using Batman for which the copyright does not expire until 2035. We'll review five hypothetical works inspired by the original Batman comic and analyze them under fair use.
    Read More ›
  • Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
    Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
    Read More ›