Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search


Are You COBRA-Ready?
Early last year, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) published proposed regulations updating the notice and disclosure requirements applicable to health care continuation coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA). These proposed regulations update model notices, give disclosure guidance, and establish two new required COBRA notices. The proposed regulations were originally effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2004. However, in September, the DOL announced a delayed effective date in order to allow employers and plan administrators time to comply with the new requirements. The effective date is now 6 months after the DOL's adoption of the final rules to implement the administrative changes required by the new rules. The DOL expects to issue final rules in early 2004.
Practice Tip: <B>Talk About the Internet ' It's Not Just for Data Anymore</b>
Controlling operational costs is a constant challenge and typically a priority for all law firms. Telephones ' phone switch and desk sets as well as local and long distance telephone service ' are a traditionally significant operational cost component, and a chronic administrative headache. Over the past few years, a set of technologies has evolved that offers the potential to take a big bite out of telephone costs, as well as significantly impact attorney and staff productivity. These emerging technologies are referred to as Voice Over Internet Protocol, or VoIP. Developments in speed and reliability of computer technologies combined with dramatic increases of Internet bandwidth have resulted in increasing quality and reliability of service. Since the mid-1990s, VoIP has moved from the virtual back alleys of the techie world to the front office of the enterprise. As a result, voice communication traffic routed over the Internet is rapidly expanding.
Bits & Bytes
Kroll Inc. has announced that it has acquired Oyez Legal Technologies Limited (OLT), the U.K. market leader in litigation support and legal information…
Product Review: Timeslips 2004
Version 2004 has several important new features that should justify upgrades by current Timeslips users, and create interest for new users as well.
What Lies Beneath: Technology That Supports Effective Compliance
Much has been written about the reporting requirements mandated by federal laws such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act), the Health Insurance Portability &amp; Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act enacted in 1999 (GLBA), but less has been said about the technology that underlies successful efforts to comply. What is clear is that enterprise software and integrated records management are the only viable ways to meet these requirements. The software selected must take into account both changes in these requirements, and the prospect of future state and federal retention and reporting requirements. Since software doesn't exist in a vacuum, hardware and network considerations must be part of the overall system strategy. Law firms with corporate clients and corporate counsel need to be involved in the planning and implementation of such a system.
Cameo Clips
Recent cases in entertainment law.
Decision of Note: <B>Court Upholds Sound-Recording Synch Licenses For Recordings</B>
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decided that Universal Music Group had the right to issue synchronization licenses for the use of sound recordings of singer Connie Francis in motion pictures. <i>Franconero v. Universal Music Corp.</i>, 02-1963. The ruling is the latest to follow the New York Court of Appeals decision in <i>Greenfield v. Philles Records Inc.</i>, 98 N.Y.2d 562, 780 N.E.2d 166, 750 N.Y.S.2d 565 (2002), that a record company obtains rights that artists fail to reserve in recording agreements.
Peer-to-Peer Downloading Legalized in Canada
Before the Canadian Copyright Act was amended in 1998, copying any copyrighted sound recording for almost any purpose infringed copyright in Canada. The 1998 amendment legalized copying of sound recordings for the private use of the person who makes the copy. But it was unclear whether the amendment legalized Internet music downloading. In Dec. 2003, the Canadian Copyright Board determined that downloading music from peer-to-peer file-sharing services is legal as long as the downloaded file is used as a "personal copy." In its recent determination, however, the Board didn't declare uploading to be legal and stopped shy of completely legalizing peer-to-peer music trading.
Industry Bright Spot: Deals for Licensing Ring Tones For Use in Cell Phones
In an industry plagued by shrinking CD sales, the rapid growth in the consumer market for ring tones has been a music business bright spot. In fact, a number of companies have entered the market to provide musical compositions for use by consumers as ring tones for cell phones. The contracts for these companies to license songs from copyright owners vary, and this article touches on many of the issues involved.
Courthouse Steps
Recently filed cases in entertainment law, straight from the steps of the Los Angeles Superior Court.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Artist Challenges Copyright Office Refusal to Register Award-Winning AI-Assisted Work
    Copyright law has long struggled to keep pace with advances in technology, and the debate around the copyrightability of AI-assisted works is no exception. At issue is the human authorship requirement: the principle that a work must have a human author to be eligible for copyright protection. While the Copyright Office has previously cited this "bedrock requirement of copyright" to reject registrations, recent decisions have focused on the role of human authorship in the context of AI.
    Read More ›
  • Recently Introduced Bill Would Limit ITC 'Domestic Industry by Subpoena'
    Patent infringement disputes in the United States are not only heard in district courts. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) also decides high-stakes intellectual property disputes — with the remedy for the IP rights holder not being damages, but rather an exclusion order that can block a competitor's importation of infringing articles into the U.S. That remedy can be incredibly powerful for companies engaged in stiff competition in the U.S. market.
    Read More ›
  • Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
    This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
    Read More ›