Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search


John Gaal's Ethics Corner
November 12, 2003
Your ethics questions answered by the expert.
Decisions of Interest
November 12, 2003
Recent rulings of interest to your practice.
UK Announces Labeling Guides
November 12, 2003
New guidelines for the design of drug labeling and packaging were announced March 3 by Britain's Health minister, Lord Philip Hunt.
Index
November 12, 2003
A complete listing of all cases discussed in this issue.
Decisions of Interest
November 12, 2003
Recent decisions of importance to your practice.
Quiz of the Month
November 12, 2003
Test your knowledge of the law!
John Gaal's Ethics Corner
November 12, 2003
Your ethics questions answered by the expert.
Recent Developments from Around the States
November 12, 2003
National cases of interest to your practice.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
    This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
    Read More ›
  • Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
    Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
    Read More ›
  • The Stranger to the Deed Rule
    In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.
    Read More ›