Digital Dictation: Make the Leap
January 27, 2006
When we went digital in July 2004, we quickly shook off the limitations of analog tapes. We still dictate into hand-held recorders, but now instead of being captured on a tape, the dictation goes directly into an audio file in the computer. Each piece of dictation has its own audio file. When the dictation is completed, a single click sends it to a transcriber. Because each audio file is separate, it's easy to flag items with a high priority, so that typists can move them ahead in the queue.
CD: Proposal Centers and Marketing Automation
January 11, 2006
Telephone and Web-based conference will teach you how to produce better proposals and marketing materials more efficiently. This is a critical need for firms that are growing rapidly and is heightened by continuing corporate efforts to converge their outside counsel.
Online: Learn About Punitive Damages on the Web
January 06, 2006
There is a wealth of information about punitive damages on the Internet, including the Web sites of various organizations and law schools, as well as blogs. Here is a sample of what's available.
The Federal Equipment Marketplace: Vendors and OEMs Benefit from Finance Company Relationships
January 06, 2006
The federal equipment marketplace is one of the bright spots in the economy. Many vendors and OEMs are now working with finance companies that have federal experience to compete for more than $45 billion in transactions that potentially qualify for a lease-financing solution. The size and volume of these transactions are expected to grow over the next several years.
Is Your Computer Leasing Company Responsible for Data Security?
January 06, 2006
Picture this scenario: You are the owner of a small to mid-sized business and have decided that it is in your best interest to lease your company's computer equipment. This may be because prudent financial planning dictates a lease versus buy decision; or you may want to be able to run the most current, up-to-date applications and the short time span of a computer lease allows you to do so. Whatever the case, when you make this decision, you have just assumed a very important responsibility — one that should not be taken lightly. You have just become personally responsible for the security of your own and your clients' personal data. It is your responsibility to personally safeguard the social security numbers, banking information, healthcare data, credit information, or anything else that could lead to catastrophic consequences if found in the wrong hands.
Can U.S. Patents Be Drafted to Rein in Overseas Infringers?
January 05, 2006
The increasing transnational nature of communications systems and, more specifically, the frequency and ease with which Internet transactions may be handled from locations around the globe make more difficult the enforcement of certain patent rights. Technology allows transactions involving participants (human and/or machine) to be in more than one nation, and a working system or method to be fragmented across a number of jurisdictions. This type of scenario may frustrate efforts to enforce patent rights when no one jurisdiction includes all of the elements necessary to establish infringement. This situation arises most frequently in the context of the Internet where an accused infringer services U.S. customers using servers located outside the country. Although the U.S. courts have recognized this problem, the law in this area is far from settled and focusing on these issues from the beginning of the patent application drafting process will increase the chances of successfully enforcing such patents.
Will Presumptive Injunctions Against Infringers Be Relics of the Past?
January 05, 2006
In American law, courts exercise their awesome powers through injunctions. Courts have used injunctions to implement decisions addressing many of the most divisive social issues of the day: from integrating public schools to even arguably affecting presidential elections. </i>E.g., Bush v. Gore,</i> 531 U.S. 98 (2000) (enjoining Florida ballot recount); <i>Brown v. Board of Education,</i> 349 U.S. 294 (1955) (directing district courts to supervise "transition to a system of public education freed of racial discrimination"). <i>See New York Times Co. v. United States,</i> 403 U.S. 713 (1971) (refusing to grant injunction to prevent publication of "Pentagon Papers").
