Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search


Decisions of Interest
April 29, 2013
In-depth study of two recent cases.
NJ & CT News
April 29, 2013
What's happening in neighboring states.
Forensic Custody Reports
April 29, 2013
It is the belief of the authors of this article that due process of law is being denied to <i>pro se</i> and represented litigants alike when the fundamental right to custody of one's child is at stake ...
Attorney Communication with DSS
April 29, 2013
What if there are problematic issues with a DSS investigation, or with the caseworker assigned by DSS? When, and how, if at all, may a party's attorney contact DSS about those problems?
Verdicts
April 29, 2013
Analysis of a key ruling.
Med Mal News
April 29, 2013
A look at recent news and litigation.
May issue in PDF format
April 29, 2013
&#133;
Drug & Device News
April 29, 2013
Recent news items of importance.
Why Lawyers Need to Write Less Like Marshall and More Like MapQuest
April 29, 2013
Though we tend to think that good writing never changes, writing in many parts of the legal and business worlds has probably changed more in the last decade than in any comparable period over the last five centuries. Those who fail to adapt will pay the consequences.
Failure-to-Detect Claims Against Dermopathologists
April 29, 2013
Last month, the author discussed a hypothetical medical malpractice case in which a dermopathologist midread a patient's pathology slide and then reported that no evidence of cancer was found. The discussion concludes herein.

MOST POPULAR STORIES

  • Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
    Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
    Read More ›
  • The Article 8 Opt In
    The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
    Read More ›