Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Search

We found 1,057 results for "The Corporate Counselor"...

WARNING! Employees' Entertainment May Be Employers' Headache
Most employers have come to realize that personal use of the Internet at work by employees can decrease productivity, and that employees downloading inappropriate material can lead to hostile work environment claims. What many employers have not yet thought about is the potentially explosive problems facing them as the music industry continues its crackdown on those who illegally download and share pirated music files over the Internet.
Civil Litigation Implications of Corporate Employees' Criminal Acts
When corporate employees engage in criminal wrongdoing, the result is often civil litigation against their employer. The criminal conviction of such employees, whether by trial or plea, or their invocation of the privilege against self-incrimination, can have serious adverse consequences in related civil litigations against their employer, even if the employee (or former employee) is not a party. This article discusses the use of such evidence against corporations.
Export of Controlled Goods to Canada: Pitfalls for the Unwary
While Canada-U.S. trade relations have been historically close, and cross-border trade greatly liberalized since the entry into force of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement in 1988 and the NAFTA in 1994, the complex area of trade in defense products remains highly regulated and subject, in certain respects, to important restrictions. Significant regulatory pitfalls exist for companies with continentally integrated operations in the form of export permit requirements for items that are transferred across (and frequently back across) the U.S.-Canada border. Corporate non-compliance with these requirements, even though unintentional, can lead potentially to heavy penalties under both U.S. and Canadian law.
A Patch in Time Saves Nine: Liability Risks for Unpatched Software
Computer security issues are commanding rapidly increasing attention from companies, due to increases in both targeted attacks from hackers, and Internet viruses and worms that affect numerous computer systems simultaneously. For both types of attacks, an important line of defense for a company is to make sure that its computers run only updated software, including the use of "patches" to repair identified security holes. Computer security experts have long recommended prompt installation of patches, invoking the old saw that "a stitch in time saves nine." This article suggests that risks of legal liability for companies that do not apply security patches promptly are significant and increasing.
WARN Act Reaches Equity Owners
The Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York has allowed a class of 6,500 plaintiffs to pursue their complaint against several investment companies for violations of the Workers Adjustment and Notification, or WARN, Act. In doing so, the court in In re Vogt, 2004 WL 187153, adopted and applied not the traditional piercing-the-corporate-veil test but instead the more narrowly focused and easier to establish "DOL test," based on the Department of Labor's WARN regulations. <br>This case should be of concern to all employers, not just equity investors. The nation's economy now seems to be hovering between recession and recovery.
New Ethical Requirements: Attorney-Client Privilege and In-House Counsel
There are several standard topics that in-house counsel have always watched carefully, such as the subtlety of ethics questions, conflicts, who is considered a client and the standard privilege issues. But times have changed, and the most vigilant may still find themselves in untenable positions. The old mantra for in-house counsel ' watch your back ' has been replaced with the question: "Whose back are you watching?" As we forge ahead, as important as it is to discern who the clients are is telling them and reminding ourselves how we maintain the privilege that is so critical to in-house attorney-client communications.
What the SAFETY Act of 2002 Means for Your Company
We all know that since 9/11, the American public has a heightened sense of anxiety about their personal safety. Our legislative body, sensing America's anxiety, created a new agency, the Department of Homeland Security ostensibly to protect us from terrorist threats. But, while doing so, Congress snuck in a compelling tort reform program. Hidden beneath the folds of the legislative verbiage creating the DHS, situated immediately before the miscellaneous provisions, lies a new program to incentivize and protect individuals and companies engaged in developing anti-terrorist technologies: the SAFETY Act of 2002. Surprisingly, the private sector, so far, has not voiced much enthusiasm for it.
Insurance Coverage For Blast Faxes
The past few months have seen an explosion in the number of lawsuits filed under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, a federal statute that prohibits transmittal of unsolicited advertisements by fax without first obtaining the prior express invitation or permission of the recipient. These lawsuits ' particularly when filed as class actions ' expose defendants to substantial defense costs and the potential for large liabilities. <br>These TCPA lawsuits cases are, in turn, spawning disputes between TCPA defendants and commercial general liability (CGL) insurers as to whether policyholders are entitled to a defense and/or indemnity for TCPA claims under standard-form CGL policy. This article briefly explores these insurance coverage issues. It concludes that, given recent case law, policyholders have a strong chance of recovering their defense costs and any settlements or judgments in TCPA lawsuits.
Allocating Administrative Costs in Defined Contribution Retirement Plans
The Employee Benefit Security Administration of the Department of Labor (DOL) has recently announced a more liberal view toward charging tax-qualified…
If It Ain't Lawyering, It Must be Marketing
Few jobs in the world are more rewarding than the role of a marketing professional at a law firm. Where else can someone talk to the greatest legal minds, reporters from the Wall Street Journal and the General Counsel of a Fortune 500 company in one day? Add to this the situation where the concept of marketing is changing almost on a daily basis, and you have a dream position for a talented, visionary marketing guru. However, as any in-house veteran will tell you, some aspects of the actual job were not specifically mentioned in the job description. Professionals strongly lobby for grandiose titles such as Chief Marketing Officer or Global Director of Business Development when they first enter their firm. It looks great on a business card. It also really impresses people at your next high school reunion and can compensate for the extra 20 pounds you might be carrying since people last saw you on prom night.

MOST POPULAR STORIES