Part 2: Decisions Since Akamai and Practice Insights" /> Part 2: Decisions Since Akamai and Practice Insights" />
Follow Us

Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Intellectual Property Litigation Patent Litigation

Joint Infringement Post-Akamai: Understanding the Impact on Prosecution and Litigation Strategies
Part 2: Decisions Since Akamai and Practice Insights

Reviews the recent Federal Circuit Eli Lilly case as well as district court cases that have interpreted the new standard and identifies prosecution and litigation strategies for practicing post-Akamai

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

This two-part article explores the new joint infringement standard set forth in the Federal Circuit’s 2015 Akamai v. Limelight decision, 797 F.3d 1020, 1023 (Fed. Cir. 2015). Part 1 deconstructed the new standard and identified several ways in which courts could interpret and apply it. Part 2 reviews the recent Federal Circuit Eli Lilly case as well as district court cases that have interpreted the new standard and identifies prosecution and litigation strategies for practicing post-Akamai.

This premium content is locked for The Intellectual Property Strategist subscribers only

Continue reading by getting
started with a subscription.

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PRACTITIONERS.
  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical analysis of developments in patent, copyright and trademark law
  • Tap into expert guidance from top intellectual property lawyers and experts

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe Now For Unlimited Access

Read These Next