Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Q: I recently received an electronic version of a document from my opponent. It is my understanding that there is a way to “look behind” the visible document sent to me, to discover earlier versions of the document that may have been drafted. This “look-behind” may also reveal who else was sent the document for review, as well as any comments they may have made regarding the document. It seems to me that since my opponent chose to give me the document in this electronic form, it is okay for me to try to discover whatever other information it contains. Is that correct?
A: The New York State Bar Association Committee on Professional Ethics recently addressed this very issue, and concluded that the answer is no, it is not permissible to do so. Formal Opinion 749(2002) concludes that using technology to examine electronically received communications from an adversary (or electronically “bugging” and tracing communications sent to an adversary to see where else they are sent) is a violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility because it may lead to discovery of confidences and secrets of your adversary's client. This is believed to be the first, and only, ethics opinion on this subject.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.